Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 16 Jul 2018 11:28:13 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <20180716.112813.1857756879663677102.davem@davemloft.net>
To:     me@tobin.cc
Cc:     sridhar.samudrala@intel.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] docs: Fix failover build warnings
From:   David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
In-Reply-To: <20180711214250.19039-1-me@tobin.cc>
References: <20180711214250.19039-1-me@tobin.cc>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

From: "Tobin C. Harding" <me@tobin.cc>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 07:42:48 +1000

> This is my first patch set to net-next.  Please shout loud and clear if
> I've botched anything.
> 
> Recently failover and net_failover modules were added to the mainline.
> Documentation was included in rst format but they were not added to the
> toctree in `networking/index.rst`.  Also building docs for net_failover
> is currently emitting a few warnings.
> 
> Patch 1 adds failover and net_failover to the index toctree
> Patch 2 fixes the build warnings for net_failover
> 
> I haven't been super active on netdev list so if there is some reason I
> missed why these files are not in the index please do say so.
> 
> Has there been any discussion on preferred order for the toctree index
> list?  I just added them to the bottom of the list.

Series applied, thanks.