Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m36-v6csp2690427imm; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 12:22:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpezvbfRp9DMHoEeA8vK06ArBSN0DPkDrlk7mOXpYRm1Cr0vSjRbhZHyKm8jUY7rxxksR9BN X-Received: by 2002:a62:283:: with SMTP id 125-v6mr19254044pfc.51.1531768924464; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 12:22:04 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1531768924; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=YBPks5+CNubdjZNHFgQRGkqfGKqIi1qY3SvZwDxQ8FbCCAWfKQZHBaqFxtyISgMhwL DvpHH61pZbG0W/lP8qkhBAKwkb6IH5MTf2dF5ccplnXP1wGc/hbfUBllAWtDYWhKTKmM MCAl4kmQJcIODMdlpTgdqJhXd5KYEqdjG+Ut6dO4T+z2cmYeOtBTIZk8VudDAkwLE6wa 0tkUR38gdNGG5+depjN9qERLwmDivG6mFzRTr41laTWOZaXqo4C4VQ9EPfL0BxyyFmmu x3Gt4shGXf6Ux6zzzMed00zX8H4aMlqui3cdMGnc4nN2W02jgMlscobV1bmQo9rnK4VF qYlg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :message-id:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date :arc-authentication-results; bh=t95cSQBsU7u2l0yroRf+2vF7hbFrsuuhZx+2Z9JZqf8=; b=DAb24iPdTj0pICUnN+a+XqSRVQDhnihyVhbhgKtyOHFbwZPLDMywm4WMoqPhdIuQJu u3Gr9/OuYWs1ggwxPL8J8npZ5e3sGGAObesK/y0c5UfBu04f0szLZ5QyLEQ5muZMXJpq MWUOV2ZVWAJK7BFSTl23rMu7PhHx+si39/yGmkhZ9LtczAMbfH2T/KoRwtREacHlwxIv Clmv5jmsQY7g+sRllfhgxFDTIzRGV0PubJ24sXFNjk6RPs5cd9lveel7Apz/P2WNtAQ1 FIG7RNDGuOpKU6oB190QylaLh+zKBdAHs7lBiDxh0vIiunRrO7Jh+Tf1P8zWAqvPNAZz eoDA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 6-v6si30109632pgg.366.2018.07.16.12.21.48; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 12:22:04 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728787AbeGPTt7 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 16 Jul 2018 15:49:59 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:52540 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728075AbeGPTt6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jul 2018 15:49:58 -0400 Received: from p4fea5a5a.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([79.234.90.90] helo=nanos) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ff93K-0002l7-PP; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 21:20:58 +0200 Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 21:20:58 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Alan Cox cc: Dave Hansen , Rich Felker , x86@kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , David Woodhouse , LKML Subject: Re: cpu_no_speculation omissions? In-Reply-To: <1531767303.4364.109.camel@linux.intel.com> Message-ID: References: <20180716160513.GA6080@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <193fb2f5-8f6c-8fe6-298f-a6af4fae862a@linux.intel.com> <1531767303.4364.109.camel@linux.intel.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 16 Jul 2018, Alan Cox wrote: > On Mon, 2018-07-16 at 10:28 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > > On 07/16/2018 09:56 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > On Mon, 16 Jul 2018, Rich Felker wrote: > > > > At least the Centerton (late-generation Bonnell uarch) Atom > > > > family is > > > > omitted from the cpu_no_speculation table added by commit > > > > fec9434a12f3 > > > > to arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c. Is this intentional? Would a > > > > patch > > > > adding it and possibly other omissions be welcome? > > > > > > Probably. Dave? > > > > IIRC, Alan Cox was compiling a list on what is affected vs. not. He > > would know way better than I. > > The pre Silvermont atom cores are in order. When I did the original > list I didn't bother with all the 32bit cores as we didn't have any > 32bit mitigations then. At least we should give the users that warm and fuzzy feeling that they are not affected. Thanks, tglx