Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m36-v6csp2834592imm; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 15:17:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpfOAXlndpJVmZjTQxRv9aHQ58S6+hVcundkYronTIOAdx1SOqAzPNnI26HiOl8rfQJBiGK6 X-Received: by 2002:a63:8c51:: with SMTP id q17-v6mr17443063pgn.236.1531779455677; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 15:17:35 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1531779455; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=YxNV3UJZPD+1FtHrgKbmzbYK3jfuZQtHrluC4tXzTP1DXzXvGoa13OTzH+6qAvR6Jf Gt1OK+vEmOtecL+HZyPgooaQwhEY7HCkguthsmD4xZx5R+1BTRytJKemrCBM1+ElVXG5 8WD5o02py9dx7wgRhfULYnkMvCAA5VNrQLk3PGLnexjZGlSqbGXEU5uwnGogRQ+X5vcM AfqhcU8F1R4Twpfal7R+kdqar4UfMAFNSbL5rXlSd66wRz2zp3GjC5PFxbpf8YjhUWa9 ZUB3R1AhDUF2ADqF0xOi2rwoOX4iOA9Lkjg4ePGl9zErhGLsu3ZpvhqubnY+oUydKtLC CtgQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:message-id:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:date:to:from:arc-authentication-results; bh=w4xPtIiqZE+4Z2h9wDpHww46esD7HG3AKWlFDpmKGfM=; b=FMHZ5sISmjXUFAlbOIRGUSC5JwUMp6XmASkLoco/uMNzdLLcF7Vqdi6Yv8fAM4j8bj oiQlYcxUjqkS8hxSbP8FzdXEeDyPFybuxdr0M0iOtDvujKq/Q7W54hX5Mok3vUEo8RjM r9hs/kH3pxqdJ+ygSiv8rcfgBgG0/v0go4kw/QJjkU/cTq4dXIPF6mV0u3HurY+E4N2u EUstkeQ747h/EnC07ZJOdPf5cUR+oiXbTJ0Qlim5SM4xn+eWdDeRLg/RVd3DIh6DDLPF rmB80/RX2MMUeQLFhGBhdXDU0gsK52JuzaC58uFy1CiQSG+WilmILQ62MDtB4lTZVlNr 9Aog== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 32-v6si31126414plc.452.2018.07.16.15.17.20; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 15:17:35 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730565AbeGPWqE (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 16 Jul 2018 18:46:04 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:33072 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728794AbeGPWqE (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jul 2018 18:46:04 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay1.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04935ADE6; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 22:16:36 +0000 (UTC) From: NeilBrown To: Andy Shevchenko , Randy Dunlap , "Andrew Morton" , Daniel Vetter Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 08:16:23 +1000 Cc: LKML , DRI Development , Intel Graphics Development , Gustavo Padovan , Maarten Lankhorst , Sean Paul , David Airlie , Kees Cook , Ingo Molnar , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Wei Wang , Stefan Agner , Andrei Vagin , Yisheng Xie , Peter Zijlstra , Daniel Vetter Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel.h: Add for_each_if() In-Reply-To: References: <20180709083650.23549-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> <20180709162509.29343-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> <20180709163001.8fb8148223a57bc46a13fbda@linux-foundation.org> <20180710075328.GG3008@phenom.ffwll.local> <871scbwfd4.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> <20180711160547.59f086a587c7f3c8d3c40f0f@linux-foundation.org> <87bmbavhai.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> <79133322-b04b-f005-f1f6-25c28c5058e4@infradead.org> Message-ID: <87muuqsu6g.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jul 16 2018, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Fri, 2018-07-13 at 16:42 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> On 07/13/2018 04:37 PM, NeilBrown wrote: > >>=20 >> coding-style.rst says: >> Also, use braces when a loop contains more than a single simple >> statement: > > Independently on a) would we use some macro for condition, or b) fix > macros against this kind of nested conditions, there is another > weirdness we would like to avoid, i.e. > > for_each_foo() { > ... > } else { > ... > } > > It is written according to coding style, but too much weird. Agreed. Too weird. > > So, summarize this discussion I think we would > - keep for_each_if() in DRM subsystem alone > - fix macros which are using positive condition 'if (cond)' by replacing > with 'if (!cond) {} else' form for sake of robustness. > > Do you agree on that? I agree. Thanks, NeilBrown --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEG8Yp69OQ2HB7X0l6Oeye3VZigbkFAltNGTcACgkQOeye3VZi gbnFDQ//SB2gVd+uNlfPffgUJ2DEQdQOAitY6PtSLZWC66UlgkUMmpLm3zOytIIW Zbn9FYbz9MKLiwwkDvQP/8EpzgCHq2SUi5j5sdWm47Qalhg81ngPk2HvVVbfErTm SmnoVj3TZdem9jmlqpq9gmOsbtmZbcZQBGM9XmQQBjeBT/cZOfBequRROOZeFp2e higfsKn8vvMqATk2jwdvefrvAkaNfEawFZcPeAkGuMlFxB88R2OlLL8wg2F/3+qM RH4oOJ5FhTudBcxGP2gHCWDT0PGtC2JTL+jI0wmwYV9d8Jcoz8I+P26SyskxnYWJ CjtGBWxRHZqGfwDYVzi3i4A9aQFm5dKLTau7XgC+HMiXLdPwC0/8bRXJUv7Wezbx HyJ4aVYXBVZdjmtTslLt1RSZh1WSrh/gO7AQsbyhgJj9vGKnBPx7QX7fYfCzBMhM KEfviX5Umv1Kjayl7gKqNpcUgBKGGEMqgBTttwpOotuA9CuX0UWcXwBY1Ao/nbWT 6JY/DUlxpH0WwtZ+j/CZzUHVtToVVDzrE1+TQkWUHnjXAh78Rr2Mv1ImhydP0o89 9a7Nc1VaLZhw+SIzhcNGxVPzUH70vH6bKvZo3e1SNAjGvmS5OPS8nkRKMSXhGNKI 4ACxN5GAhA1d1NhAaklJhxbl4Uf/VGCITiQLdCxHt4/l9Dy3Nds= =WTCR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--