Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m36-v6csp3044269imm; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 20:30:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpfuiUbz89KC+VVmh5zlUmGjh4mvWDNSKkFpRvF0HwlZ3CnGyEl/NKEOitqxgpIcpz111Sy+ X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8ecb:: with SMTP id x11-v6mr19601539plo.308.1531798221280; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 20:30:21 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1531798221; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=DiM9pdMR93YAKbjI1AnSyMgQnOkeMLMJgWfgFNCGHZGq9YD0+f3DiqTI4ZK7s4QGdS 5Y07zTSh2qSHIGu9GfHGWhimHySgpfCoIVV5Gb3+XfpNm/6RNXTfk59rlKq5x9VkABVm 8pccc4UsLVigT/3OsYhi/y6DlJXM72M1Ixq/teWhG/FklYnp5uqKm65yfmNew3MP0kcl iT0Q/GcwgD3iFoVbX4lLyJPZdcVH+lyX2hYSdwWQDZ95pN/I5JqXIE7lGjdzk4f8wBF9 N6+gFDxQvE0uRjt/pYBr1+z7Q2Ude4iW5grwkMDR7W08yXHEETRfHwAWPpXgOp3ap1CB 0z7Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:references:to:from:subject:arc-authentication-results; bh=hFkpzpLABabj9paRh+MuGsbDH3JiWLEL2xibJRTSrCc=; b=zKSvuLbOf6i+nXfVigktRnH7JBweTSKpZqoJvfIGoDAK19QV2e4dOPUa1zhLi7J7lS HR2GUzHOvJYj9gUKF/1itZ1vCk7GQsOgfwfC8rMmoXv65Rhru0b2i49wnoE7KHDsArDG myJDyyWlpHEL0PixnUyhyMB5CXpjygow3TWG8pq/vyj07nNTgNsMKUuNPLgRXveWj+R2 pynoDkqL7z6K1f6upA09yRfPYC70cz3/Q+XjXZiVy5cRbqC1/SM3PX/Brar75yjJwQXf kz4lhPKMYUoHbzr3uuy2caQ5za8yyPtViNzjmW8ZE/gmoXqtI4nRSiSxPY5+TE1a/G96 eZXQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=alibaba.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s10-v6si29703392pgv.47.2018.07.16.20.30.04; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 20:30:21 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=alibaba.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730107AbeGQD7y (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 16 Jul 2018 23:59:54 -0400 Received: from out30-131.freemail.mail.aliyun.com ([115.124.30.131]:48975 "EHLO out30-131.freemail.mail.aliyun.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729927AbeGQD7y (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jul 2018 23:59:54 -0400 X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R861e4;CH=green;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=e01e01355;MF=yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=3;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0T4mHunT_1531798121; Received: from testdeMacBook-Pro.local(mailfrom:yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0T4mHunT_1531798121) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Tue, 17 Jul 2018 11:28:41 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tg: show the sum wait time of an task group From: =?UTF-8?B?546L6LSH?= To: Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <5c4c978d-e8fb-4bcb-b942-3c6d3dcfc13e@linux.alibaba.com> Message-ID: <4abd1bae-dc1e-3a13-40d4-c6c73ecc07b1@linux.alibaba.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 11:28:40 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, folks On 2018/7/4 上午11:27, 王贇 wrote: > Although we can rely on cpuacct to present the cpu usage of task > group, it is hard to tell how intense the competition is between > these groups on cpu resources. > > Monitoring the wait time of each process or sched_debug could cost > too much, and there is no good way to accurately represent the > conflict with these info, we need the wait time on group dimension. > > Thus we introduced group's wait_sum represent the conflict between > task groups, which is simply sum the wait time of group's cfs_rq. > > The 'cpu.stat' is modified to show the statistic, like: > >   nr_periods 0 >   nr_throttled 0 >   throttled_time 0 >   wait_sum 2035098795584 > > Now we can monitor the changing on wait_sum to tell how suffering > a task group is in the fight of cpu resources. > > For example: >   (wait_sum - last_wait_sum) * 100 / (nr_cpu * period_ns) == X% > > means the task group paid X percentage of period on waiting > for the cpu. Any comments please? Regards, Michael Wang > > Signed-off-by: Michael Wang > --- > > Since v1: >   Use schedstat_val to avoid compile error >   Check and skip root_task_group > >  kernel/sched/core.c | 8 ++++++++ >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c > index 78d8fac..80ab995 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c > @@ -6781,6 +6781,8 @@ static int __cfs_schedulable(struct task_group *tg, u64 period, u64 quota) > >  static int cpu_cfs_stat_show(struct seq_file *sf, void *v) >  { > +    int i; > +    u64 ws = 0; >      struct task_group *tg = css_tg(seq_css(sf)); >      struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b = &tg->cfs_bandwidth; > > @@ -6788,6 +6790,12 @@ static int cpu_cfs_stat_show(struct seq_file *sf, void *v) >      seq_printf(sf, "nr_throttled %d\n", cfs_b->nr_throttled); >      seq_printf(sf, "throttled_time %llu\n", cfs_b->throttled_time); > > +    if (schedstat_enabled() && tg != &root_task_group) { > +        for_each_possible_cpu(i) > +            ws += schedstat_val(tg->se[i]->statistics.wait_sum); > +        seq_printf(sf, "wait_sum %llu\n", ws); > +    } > + >      return 0; >  } >  #endif /* CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH */