Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180713143525.3144656-1-arnd@arndb.de>
References: <20180713143525.3144656-1-arnd@arndb.de>
From:   Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Date:   Tue, 17 Jul 2018 15:44:51 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJfpeguUfMtZ0G0uCNbxaM-F+6xKz5wcbbKZQ3YYQcH2v9J94g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RESEND] fuse: convert last timespec use to timespec64
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc:     y2038@lists.linaro.org,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
        David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com>,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 4:35 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> All of fuse uses 64-bit timestamps with the exception of the
> fuse_change_attributes(), so let's convert this one as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
> I submitted this on June 20 but got no reply. Miklos, could
> you pick this up for 4.19?

Applied, thanks.

Miklos