Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 70A5B602BC
From:   "Isaac J. Manjarres" <isaacm@codeaurora.org>
To:     peterz@infradead.org, matt@codeblueprint.co.uk, mingo@kernel.org,
        tglx@linutronix.de, bigeasy@linutronix.de
Cc:     "Isaac J. Manjarres" <isaacm@codeaurora.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, psodagud@codeaurora.org,
        gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, pkondeti@codeaurora.org,
        stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] stop_machine: Disable preemption after queueing stopper threads
Date:   Tue, 17 Jul 2018 12:35:29 -0700
Message-Id: <1531856129-9871-1-git-send-email-isaacm@codeaurora.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

This commit:

9fb8d5dc4b64 ("stop_machine, Disable preemption when
waking two stopper threads")

does not fully address the race condition that can occur
as follows:

On one CPU, call it CPU 3, thread 1 invokes
cpu_stop_queue_two_works(2, 3,...), and the execution is such
that thread 1 queues the works for migration/2 and migration/3,
and is preempted after releasing the locks for migration/2 and
migration/3, but before waking the threads.

Then, On CPU 2, a kworker, call it thread 2, is running,
and it invokes cpu_stop_queue_two_works(1, 2,...), such that
thread 2 queues the works for migration/1 and migration/2.
Meanwhile, on CPU 3, thread 1 resumes execution, and wakes
migration/2 and migration/3. This means that when CPU 2
releases the locks for migration/1 and migration/2, but before
it wakes those threads, it can be preempted by migration/2.

If thread 2 is preempted by migration/2, then migration/2 will
execute the first work item successfully, since migration/3
was woken up by CPU 3, but when it goes to execute the second
work item, it disables preemption, calls multi_cpu_stop(),
and thus, CPU 2 will wait forever for migration/1, which should
have been woken up by thread 2. However migration/1 cannot be
woken up by thread 2, since it is a kworker, so it is affine to
CPU 2, but CPU 2 is running migration/2 with preemption
disabled, so thread 2 will never run.

Disable preemption after queueing works for stopper threads
to ensure that the operation of queueing the works and waking
the stopper threads is atomic.

Fixes: 9fb8d5dc4b64 ("stop_machine, Disable preemption when waking two stopper threads")
Co-Developed-by: Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@codeaurora.org>
Co-Developed-by: Pavankumar Kondeti <pkondeti@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Isaac J. Manjarres <isaacm@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Pavankumar Kondeti <pkondeti@codeaurora.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
 kernel/stop_machine.c | 10 +++++++++-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/stop_machine.c b/kernel/stop_machine.c
index 1ff523d..e190d1e 100644
--- a/kernel/stop_machine.c
+++ b/kernel/stop_machine.c
@@ -260,6 +260,15 @@ static int cpu_stop_queue_two_works(int cpu1, struct cpu_stop_work *work1,
 	err = 0;
 	__cpu_stop_queue_work(stopper1, work1, &wakeq);
 	__cpu_stop_queue_work(stopper2, work2, &wakeq);
+	/*
+	 * The waking up of stopper threads has to happen
+	 * in the same scheduling context as the queueing.
+	 * Otherwise, there is a possibility of one of the
+	 * above stoppers being woken up by another CPU,
+	 * and preempting us. This will cause us to n ot
+	 * wake up the other stopper forever.
+	 */
+	preempt_disable();
 unlock:
 	raw_spin_unlock(&stopper2->lock);
 	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&stopper1->lock);
@@ -271,7 +280,6 @@ static int cpu_stop_queue_two_works(int cpu1, struct cpu_stop_work *work1,
 	}
 
 	if (!err) {
-		preempt_disable();
 		wake_up_q(&wakeq);
 		preempt_enable();
 	}
-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project