Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262835AbTIQUAP (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Sep 2003 16:00:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262827AbTIQUAJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Sep 2003 16:00:09 -0400 Received: from mikonos.cyclades.com.br ([200.230.227.67]:11784 "EHLO firewall.cyclades.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262752AbTIQUAD (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Sep 2003 16:00:03 -0400 Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 17:00:26 -0300 (BRT) From: Marcelo Tosatti X-X-Sender: marcelo@logos.cnet To: Bjorn Helgaas cc: Marcelo Tosatti , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.4 force_successful_syscall() In-Reply-To: <200309101626.48541.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 628 Lines: 20 On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > Here's a 2.4 backport of this change to 2.5: > > http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.5/cset@1.1046.238.7?nav=index.html > > Alpha, ppc, and sparc64 define force_successful_syscall_return() in 2.5, > but since it's not obvious to me how to do it correctly in 2.4, I left > them unchanged. Whats the reasoning behing this patch? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/