Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 18 Jul 2018 06:02:49 -0600
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
To:     Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
        linux-doc <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] docs/mm: add boot time memory management docs
Message-ID: <20180718060249.6b45605d@lwn.net>
In-Reply-To: <20180718114730.GD4302@rapoport-lnx>
References: <1530370506-21751-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
        <20180702113255.1f7504e2@lwn.net>
        <20180718114730.GD4302@rapoport-lnx>
Organization: LWN.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 14:47:30 +0300
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> > So this seems like good stuff overall.  It digs pretty deeply into the mm
> > code, though, so I'm a little reluctant to apply it without an ack from an
> > mm developer.  Alternatively, I'm happy to step back if Andrew wants to
> > pick the set up.  
> 
> Jon, does Michal's reply [1] address your concerns?
> Or should I respin and ask Andrew to pick it up? 
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20180712080006.GA328@dhcp22.suse.cz/

Michal acked #11 (the docs patch) in particular but not the series as a
whole.  But it's the rest of the series that I was most worried about :)
I'm happy for the patches to take either path, but I'd really like an
explicit ack before I apply that many changes directly to the MM code...

Thanks,

jon