Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263026AbTIRJZm (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Sep 2003 05:25:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262092AbTIRJZm (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Sep 2003 05:25:42 -0400 Received: from ping.to.com ([194.221.251.37]:42254 "EHLO ping.to.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263036AbTIRJZk (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Sep 2003 05:25:40 -0400 Subject: Re: Kernel/user process communication From: Stefan Voelkel To: John R Moser Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-wet2BZ6wCbHPXZX7nvHd" Organization: Millenux GmbH Message-Id: <1063877101.22303.162.camel@lt-sv> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.3 Date: 18 Sep 2003 11:25:01 +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1074 Lines: 35 --=-wet2BZ6wCbHPXZX7nvHd Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 05:52, John R Moser wrote: > This may be a dumb question, but is it possible to pass data between the > kernel and a userspace process? I know this is probably brain-damaged in > design, but just tell me if it's possible here.=20 There are postings on similar topics in the archive. What comes to my mind is netlink or a device file. Stefan --=-wet2BZ6wCbHPXZX7nvHd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA/aXnttWF28C4HGsQRAmJ+AJ4vIg4Llc/X3V90YUz1h7ciq9Ah3ACfVvwq //OCPLdFQkEl4P/snriXiIU= =6zTj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-wet2BZ6wCbHPXZX7nvHd-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/