Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m36-v6csp1532550imm; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 03:30:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpcDmKJ7GbW47ps8CH5xQF4S3q67hDG4JlLQ8uJWazVQBasIbuDdTl1qiK2KXeTgBdbC0ucT X-Received: by 2002:a63:ae42:: with SMTP id e2-v6mr9419708pgp.351.1531996218693; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 03:30:18 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1531996218; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=w9Yl4sE8sMrWjoAD2wq8IaGAZl4m3K45vb+cMBsLvvbo/IQJK40GegILcU0ktzFaXp xhriGB1zxT2IZtZoMSSZ6yw4nzFGBANSHG8KWvPFO6ETSL65G+kYnKDbrBJ0UCTvxvAa nTAGtvf3PLFCBzYcT3dUJOHCslxL4Vyjy3Trg9p+zQz4xnDo9Rqv71vS3nZsu6L38+O7 pzhZzmyw6soN1izWs8twB2p2VMiZ8gN6urVjC36mq88lwNxLs9lCuZyp2VoGXov/jzYJ hTKu9XlMXJk/YWXr8P6QR2sSyJb+A0wJ/gk9NmfQBajcENO/WFH7moDIVp6p22Lti6X+ ZCbw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :message-id:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date :arc-authentication-results; bh=QKTp6k7bSVNJ6vMopfbR3jk4MhNG8+hpWKO9VQ9f3Po=; b=DCawoqpmM8rR1afNrNiMnrgqKkpVXbA16yDOOU+ZNLO8dpSQ3FH9ic7LaFiK5MK0Ix RDdeJAgqdEsOIubsxZpeGY4zlEUg1ZDSpDzc6x5Ef0ujv2x4+fXt1xs4Ny42yGJTUz01 h1TlnmnSvF66TFHCmgt/wF2WIDuxKo1bFkM8HVNtLJNpj3Ad6nxNxGy47N55a605gxdN RclTZzy8x68oPH71BXqVaLI2mm4OTg+B+ivIpgOZ8voOb4GHLby2lJHbX9+bKi3jGnua hzjl3Ej62jVoO7Jt3Jzjrz43oH4swjSkfnmRNhArPw1Wu41hIUUhjsAkBGyyN7aouLWU QX0w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w133-v6si6009382pfd.313.2018.07.19.03.30.04; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 03:30:18 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730996AbeGSLLv (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 19 Jul 2018 07:11:51 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:60821 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726574AbeGSLLu (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jul 2018 07:11:50 -0400 Received: from hsi-kbw-5-158-153-52.hsi19.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de ([5.158.153.52] helo=nanos.tec.linutronix.de) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1fg6BJ-0005ST-Lf; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 12:29:09 +0200 Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 12:29:09 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Jiang Biao cc: mingo@redhat.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, luto@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, albcamus@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zhong.weidong@zte.com.cn Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/pti: check the return value of pti_user_pagetable_walk_p4d In-Reply-To: <1531870163-39088-1-git-send-email-jiang.biao2@zte.com.cn> Message-ID: References: <1531870163-39088-1-git-send-email-jiang.biao2@zte.com.cn> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 18 Jul 2018, Jiang Biao wrote: > pti_user_pagetable_walk_p4d() may return NULL, we should check the > return value to avoid NULL pointer dereference. And add warning > for fail allocation where NULL returned. > > Signed-off-by: Jiang Biao > --- > arch/x86/mm/pti.c | 10 ++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pti.c b/arch/x86/mm/pti.c > index 4d418e7..5c33a16 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/mm/pti.c > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pti.c > @@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ static p4d_t *pti_user_pagetable_walk_p4d(unsigned long address) > > if (pgd_none(*pgd)) { > unsigned long new_p4d_page = __get_free_page(gfp); > - if (!new_p4d_page) > + if (WARN_ON(!new_p4d_page)) WARN_ON_ONCE() please > return NULL; > > set_pgd(pgd, __pgd(_KERNPG_TABLE | __pa(new_p4d_page))); > @@ -195,9 +195,12 @@ static p4d_t *pti_user_pagetable_walk_p4d(unsigned long address) > static pmd_t *pti_user_pagetable_walk_pmd(unsigned long address) > { > gfp_t gfp = (GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOTRACK | __GFP_ZERO); > - p4d_t *p4d = pti_user_pagetable_walk_p4d(address); > pud_t *pud; > > + p4d_t *p4d = pti_user_pagetable_walk_p4d(address); No. This really is not how it should be done. gfp_t gfp = (GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOTRACK | __GFP_ZERO); - p4d_t *p4d = pti_user_pagetable_walk_p4d(address); + p4d_t *p4d; pud_t *pud; + p4d = pti_user_pagetable_walk_p4d(address); + if (!p4d) + return NULL; Ditto for patch 2/2. > BUILD_BUG_ON(p4d_large(*p4d) != 0); > if (p4d_none(*p4d)) { > unsigned long new_pud_page = __get_free_page(gfp); > @@ -354,6 +357,9 @@ static void __init pti_clone_p4d(unsigned long addr) > pgd_t *kernel_pgd; > > user_p4d = pti_user_pagetable_walk_p4d(addr); > + if (!user_p4d) > + return; > + > kernel_pgd = pgd_offset_k(addr); > kernel_p4d = p4d_offset(kernel_pgd, addr); > *user_p4d = *kernel_p4d; Aside of that the patch has trailing white space in 2 places. Please take the patch and apply it to your git tree localy before submitting it. Thanks, tglx