Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m36-v6csp1678799imm; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 06:09:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpffqamicLhrh2ud2EqE0dWN40joAnh9D5JQHUuZI94tHqqtwbaW6OCmpcVNiu1wWx7aljW3 X-Received: by 2002:a63:383:: with SMTP id 125-v6mr10121387pgd.421.1532005796439; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 06:09:56 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1532005796; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Dvu4JTHJoo6KO/GNgrq+FpDQCH15BkJ+CGPc9cagb4CGhG2PgA3kIxJGEeK8rjR5UT Ai7LR7GASRlpbWNftxVO7CjGIPZSGRpIZqbTaXLEivJd6YmZ5oOTUHgFE/ej9vsqa4AO +a6mHHcDJp+Vu/vf9mSusJVoYZNv52xFSVBCfnatTeb3Rrc418+EwS1R0SszfrLy3izi 20rDkpRcNAOCA7Su0ON4P5RB9fmbZuwrEvz1dFyb9tO230scHW0gUq3yB4mhrSbIcehF uUKnY9uetuM6p0NP54iBusPTWfAjZpg3caeCas5FnED1aAQvwwWA7uL6re9PRkYi82wy YAwQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=6mxyHhgOQVvgXVO4AB8Mtp2/WvcYU/BgOtEWAcaN12A=; b=auwsDuTfjC4C2JC6KnU+gQuwRvg2aR0Zxxc2SCDw7merkj9ExH0gvUk0f1Tf96Bibm 1IRdzsVcDqvYqyrvnhtqg+GMg+ZiUsGukmDgZmAhBfa4XXdH30DaHtq9o4rBUGRBN7kT kHAW19HFiMW1iXtff0eMEamr0SLjRbN3yCltRdBosgkfYx9C0yv+ORLQfEC3XaBYQ/YM 9wzDaPSqL18cEh7lmpI+Phmlr27EvC3/Y/v4lH8PJwyAxc1oBGX+wV1J8R8i+bxzxOYM 2AdnYs3k1lHEc0HBK3ZzXB5a0cJHTVEp1ngc4jV4qzykHNyqass94gqLCxpaB9gMc3+D nGyA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j17-v6si5708833pfj.104.2018.07.19.06.09.41; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 06:09:56 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731595AbeGSNwH (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 19 Jul 2018 09:52:07 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:33339 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730096AbeGSNwH (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jul 2018 09:52:07 -0400 Received: by newverein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 6EBE268D43; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 15:11:49 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 15:11:49 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Masahiro Yamada , Christoph Hellwig , Richard Weinberger , Linux Kbuild mailing list , linux-um@lists.infradead.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] kconfig: include common Kconfig files from top-level Kconfig Message-ID: <20180719131149.GA12480@lst.de> References: <20180708152004.21679-1-hch@lst.de> <20180708152004.21679-5-hch@lst.de> <17c45e87-d9be-8453-1bce-18753e0a68b9@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <17c45e87-d9be-8453-1bce-18753e0a68b9@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 12:06:26AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > All $ARCH look equivalent except for microblaze and nios2. > For those, the config SWAP in init/Kconfig (line 221) comes before (and > hence takes precedence) over arch/$(SRCARCH)/Kconfig settings, which is > def_bool n for both microblaze and nios2. Both of those are NOMMU architectures, so the default SWAP decaration should do the right thing. I wish the kconfig tools could warn about duplicate symbols, as they are basically always bogus or at least very problematic. I've update the kconfig-cleanup branch in git with the fixes, but I didn't have time to do anything but a trivial x86 test yet.