Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m36-v6csp2248451imm; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 16:23:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpca6cVU1abUaRDYweInzkDkyCn0gMRqtGKVt3aXR5WXM84XvCoe7D/5u1CHjqmT2vQmo8ox X-Received: by 2002:a62:843:: with SMTP id c64-v6mr11484202pfd.14.1532042614935; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 16:23:34 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1532042614; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=TF0vrA7dHPZnvPdwB0iRlSSxwnH5ITBu0DyJDJJ1AZ/+GZWRsWq0Y9p1XCP/ixIalf 0IaCDxT7G+C6k8poRAzRpvpNNxr7w11Qnk7G56/tzAohbk5TAwBMbgyQwOsUQbMrVv5A /z1EL4BydFB0Oyw4YgOABZWi0yngGBQh0A2w0EKYw78LTDyKw/058nKVVCO+Hpc2Zg1O pnpt5eq9655zcGJC9gLDfQ+2koUHkUhBpYxeKjVX3XqRAw9gY4pZh4eFv+GOPbDApig9 vIycs2v3IBVjtWg/8hzu2fS6lMkhZ9En2oMGdTar/hbtD3ic8+wYiVYZnwzPoBRAk43g vD3g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :message-id:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date :arc-authentication-results; bh=/6oeMgPNn/WUL6eNvJcRnXI/b7MVeKQYnAnn/HibsXI=; b=N4IG4zA803ibXBurlC9ig9xNT8DppkOSkZ1cT1Te9L4mno/Cyn14g3Z3xw0tiJhlyv Qt1lHkMOYAOu4M4ibOviWC+xbayfO2V9KmZq1K8NpzH2NW7mSCXWfdMx0H2JXj9Vsemp AU579aZSca8NEIpPCbUHXX02tSx+8Ab1Ke1vZZFm7OH7lKe2I87P3nFv5y5sccYzQTWZ 45xquWwby2qBRQMv5sgDzzPsNs5Yrb8qlMy3b6I+PSDcPz19LTuQF4jMEDWV0qPpVMtP I/QH09THOlsHBhrUBuY79uzvjcTRJJKZpzG3W0rvUJFJ+9+XZnrLKru+HS8efbkf4qz6 jBLA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j61-v6si373125plb.68.2018.07.19.16.23.20; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 16:23:34 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731205AbeGTAHC (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 19 Jul 2018 20:07:02 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:35066 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727743AbeGTAHC (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jul 2018 20:07:02 -0400 Received: from p4fea5a5a.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([79.234.90.90] helo=nanos) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1fgIEo-00015v-HK; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 01:21:34 +0200 Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 01:21:33 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Joerg Roedel cc: Ingo Molnar , "H . Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Linus Torvalds , Andy Lutomirski , Dave Hansen , Josh Poimboeuf , Juergen Gross , Peter Zijlstra , Borislav Petkov , Jiri Kosina , Boris Ostrovsky , Brian Gerst , David Laight , Denys Vlasenko , Eduardo Valentin , Greg KH , Will Deacon , aliguori@amazon.com, daniel.gruss@iaik.tugraz.at, hughd@google.com, keescook@google.com, Andrea Arcangeli , Waiman Long , Pavel Machek , "David H . Gutteridge" , jroedel@suse.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/39 v8] PTI support for x86-32 In-Reply-To: <1531906876-13451-1-git-send-email-joro@8bytes.org> Message-ID: References: <1531906876-13451-1-git-send-email-joro@8bytes.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Joerg, On Wed, 18 Jul 2018, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > here is version 8 of my patches to enable PTI on x86-32. The > last version got some good review which I mostly worked into > this version. I went over the whole set once again and did not find any real issues. As the outstanding review comments are addressed, I decided that only broader exposure can shake out eventually remaining issues. Applied and pushed out, so it should show up in linux-next soon. The mm regression seems to be sorted, so there is no immeditate fallout expected. Thanks for your patience in reworking this over and over. Thanks to Andy for putting his entry focssed eyes on it more than once. Great work! Thanks, tglx