Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261299AbTISEnS (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Sep 2003 00:43:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261294AbTISEnS (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Sep 2003 00:43:18 -0400 Received: from ns.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:51392 "EHLO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261296AbTISEnQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Sep 2003 00:43:16 -0400 Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 06:43:15 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: Grant Grundler Cc: Peter Chubb , linux-ns83820@kvack.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: NS83820 2.6.0-test5 driver seems unstable on IA64 Message-ID: <20030919044315.GC7666@wotan.suse.de> References: <16234.33565.64383.838490@wombat.disy.cse.unsw.edu.au> <20030919043847.GA2996@cup.hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030919043847.GA2996@cup.hp.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 984 Lines: 23 On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 09:38:47PM -0700, Grant Grundler wrote: > On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 02:16:29PM +1000, Peter Chubb wrote: > > The obvious approach of realigning the SKB by 2 bytes seems not to > > work. > > Could you be more detailed about the "obvious approach"? > ie show the diff of what you changed. > > Several other NIC driver "alias" (as davidm describes it) the buffer > by reserving two bytes at the beginning of the recieve buffer > where header and payload data are DMAd on inbound traffic. It is a mixed blessing, because the result is a non cache line aligned buffer. Some NIC chipsets don't like this because they have to do a read-modify-write cycle for the first cache line and cannot burst the full packet. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/