Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Tomas Bortoli <tomasbortoli@gmail.com>
To:     ericvh@gmail.com, rminnich@sandia.gov, lucho@ionkov.net
Cc:     jiangyiwen@huawei.com, davem@davemloft.net,
        v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller@googlegroups.com,
        Tomas Bortoli <tomasbortoli@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] net/9p/trans_fd.c: fix double list_del() and race in access
Date:   Fri, 20 Jul 2018 15:28:01 +0200
Message-Id: <20180720132801.22749-1-tomasbortoli@gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

This patch uses list_del_init() instead of list_del() to eliminate "req_list". This to prevent double list_del()'s calls to the same list from provoking a GPF. Furthermore, this patch fixes an access to "req_list" that was made without getting the relative lock.

Signed-off-by: Tomas Bortoli <tomasbortoli@gmail.com>
Reported-by: syzbot+735d926e9d1317c3310c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
---

 net/9p/trans_fd.c | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/9p/trans_fd.c b/net/9p/trans_fd.c
index a64b01c56e30..131bb1f059e6 100644
--- a/net/9p/trans_fd.c
+++ b/net/9p/trans_fd.c
@@ -223,7 +223,9 @@ static void p9_conn_cancel(struct p9_conn *m, int err)
 
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(req, rtmp, &cancel_list, req_list) {
 		p9_debug(P9_DEBUG_ERROR, "call back req %p\n", req);
-		list_del(&req->req_list);
+		spin_lock_irqsave(&m->client->lock, flags);
+		list_del_init(&req->req_list);
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&m->client->lock, flags);
 		if (!req->t_err)
 			req->t_err = err;
 		p9_client_cb(m->client, req, REQ_STATUS_ERROR);
@@ -369,7 +371,7 @@ static void p9_read_work(struct work_struct *work)
 		spin_lock(&m->client->lock);
 		if (m->req->status != REQ_STATUS_ERROR)
 			status = REQ_STATUS_RCVD;
-		list_del(&m->req->req_list);
+		list_del_init(&m->req->req_list);
 		spin_unlock(&m->client->lock);
 		p9_client_cb(m->client, m->req, status);
 		m->rc.sdata = NULL;
@@ -684,7 +686,7 @@ static int p9_fd_cancel(struct p9_client *client, struct p9_req_t *req)
 	spin_lock(&client->lock);
 
 	if (req->status == REQ_STATUS_UNSENT) {
-		list_del(&req->req_list);
+		list_del_init(&req->req_list);
 		req->status = REQ_STATUS_FLSHD;
 		ret = 0;
 	}
@@ -701,7 +703,7 @@ static int p9_fd_cancelled(struct p9_client *client, struct p9_req_t *req)
 	 * remove it from the list.
 	 */
 	spin_lock(&client->lock);
-	list_del(&req->req_list);
+	list_del_init(&req->req_list);
 	spin_unlock(&client->lock);
 
 	return 0;
-- 
2.11.0