Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
To:     Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com>,
        "broonie@kernel.org" <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "jonathanh@nvidia.com" <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
        "thierry.reding@gmail.com" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
        "tiwai@suse.com" <tiwai@suse.com>,
        "lgirdwood@gmail.com" <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
        "perex@perex.cz" <perex@perex.cz>,
        "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>,
        "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: tegra: probe deferral error reporting
Date:   Sat, 21 Jul 2018 15:03:57 +0300
Message-ID: <2195096.d8yV6ZqeS2@dimapc>
In-Reply-To: <1532174119.19673.24.camel@toradex.com>
References: <20180720080424.31505-1-marcel@ziswiler.com> <8512069.csTsg4TRIJ@dimapc> <1532174119.19673.24.camel@toradex.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Saturday, 21 July 2018 14:55:21 MSK Marcel Ziswiler wrote:
> On Sat, 2018-07-21 at 14:17 +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 
> > On Saturday, 21 July 2018 12:56:15 MSK Mark Brown wrote:
> > 
> > > On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 12:31:07PM +0000, Marcel Ziswiler wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On Fri, 2018-07-20 at 13:16 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > >  	ac97->sync_gpio = of_get_named_gpio(pdev-
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >dev.of_node,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >  	
> > > > > >  	
> > > > > >  					    "nvidia,codec-
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > sync-
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > gpio", 0);
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >  	if (!gpio_is_valid(ac97->sync_gpio)) {
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > -		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no codec-sync GPIO
> > > > > > supplied\n");
> > > > > > +		ret = ac97->sync_gpio;
> > > > > > +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no codec-sync GPIO
> > > > > > supplied:
> > > > > > %d\n", ret);
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >  		goto err_clk_put;
> > > > > >  	
> > > > > >  	
> > > > > >  	}
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > This isn't reporting an error code associated with the attempt
> > > > > to
> > > > > find a
> > > > > codec-sync GPIO, it's the result of some other operation.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > What exactly is then the of_get_named_gpio() above please doing
> > > > if
> > > > not getting the codec sync GPIO? I am not following you, sorry.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > It's not in any way involved in setting the value of ret, whatever
> > > value
> > > that has it's nothing to do with that operation.
> > 
> > 
> > The comment to gpio_is_valid() says that it "Returns GPIO number to
> > use with 
> > Linux generic GPIO API, or one of the errno value on the error
> > condition". 
> > Comment doesn't explicitly states that the returned GPIO number is
> > always 
> > valid, but it is kinda implied.
> 
> 
> Do you mean I should be assigning the return value of gpio_is_valid()
> to ret and use that instead?

No, gpio_is_valid() returns a boolean. I think your patch is fine as it is is.

Probably Mark meant something like this:

        ac97->sync_gpio = of_get_named_gpio(pdev->dev.of_node,
                                            "nvidia,codec-sync-gpio", 0);
        if (ac97->sync_gpio < 0) {
                ret = ac97->sync_gpio;
                dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no codec-sync GPIO supplied: %d\n", ret);
                goto err_clk_put;
        }

        if (!gpio_is_valid(ac97->sync_gpio)) {
                ret = -EINVAL;
                goto err_clk_put;
       }

But that is not needed because of_get_named_gpio() returns either a valid GPIO 
number or a error code.