Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m36-v6csp4268254imm; Sat, 21 Jul 2018 14:37:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpfY6VQYjDDpaTqAs6QWCgQEDYNwoCmtGjB7qf1x52MvpPi21YAejg0KgYb8KX7qMdorkplu X-Received: by 2002:a62:4308:: with SMTP id q8-v6mr7422222pfa.86.1532209036667; Sat, 21 Jul 2018 14:37:16 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1532209036; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=nnRAiCNk9FExPUauYW4QfcZgpt/vMFeutaW3SClw7qiBpbZW0KGCLdIiB6WaLkaz1L P5/D0+7lesfTOXWxsLVxr25KizO21Yf5u/saLtTQcC9PuP9uF/HiQlCIFazrrkl/kFLM n4I6vEUmjUjZW53bJu1rebyjCg5OizyXSHv9gryRK3iYz4Vo2QwL98OzOCc1PBSg0aaS BgS1L8L1QSMjvAAY5CJCBxQpqOvMjrzHYyjc687BTLgx/2V8uqqdUS63Rf7r80jfBlOh brEw0dFo/p1jp6TggnLcg1U4pMTd2XDPOBvnB9cJnB1W7s4fKctyF8hvQUD1TcMc/UpV /Lhg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=ko9EqyqGqvMjncDtON9O136bCfOfMk21zGU8VR16JIw=; b=mbqMGTp9sj5LTT1GNUNuUF6RMzB7RThVGF1Dz3u/9+VPqaYv1q3vVjJgQYVAFhs4z4 JPYACf4AJfy842/Ga4ss0aAu1+pyhGwZGQ+2LfeJSkNZ87ayMczmhpsnbIHzHWn8lc+n tUPwc2OmyFLmWifbH+52LnsRmrQwPcuq6HkmEHghtk2c8ZgaOh22O4+6DtmxJCFkv9g+ i4CKjv63hhZrLq4xVcqZWnBWpWYSYwJzeIC7hfvBY6UabX1Y9heJbcaP6ffbhYJbVYPJ NySKTC2C1a5eRE90MGZFMx6H3rVIO9yDCyrt/eHmesa1WXtT7UsX3+qsBAVrdEKbYyUm Ks6Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@lixom-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=0Ja5fPs7; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k1-v6si4468379pld.40.2018.07.21.14.37.02; Sat, 21 Jul 2018 14:37:16 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@lixom-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=0Ja5fPs7; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728236AbeGUW3P (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 21 Jul 2018 18:29:15 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-f194.google.com ([209.85.208.194]:45036 "EHLO mail-lj1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728185AbeGUW3O (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jul 2018 18:29:14 -0400 Received: by mail-lj1-f194.google.com with SMTP id q127-v6so13835130ljq.11 for ; Sat, 21 Jul 2018 14:35:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lixom-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ko9EqyqGqvMjncDtON9O136bCfOfMk21zGU8VR16JIw=; b=0Ja5fPs73jqNj+D0KrXPcgUYLOIaKQljhfoWodPyNq9xWOGIWwTl0skns9NNG+pcE9 uRrWvUA00L/YZFUCDCFGQ+J2FoYyL+IGVhjJNrq6op8rBgcuAC+5VumO8O1CcljB2NbP Pytx4I+xsleQQmmqemXmIlzlo+UZGV1U1zcr86wOfNYgY/+9rq8cjqAllnsNjuZjql1h gmlvWJZJHWyOX9LcKe2kY1OAuzcnppNMghN6R2xF4o5qGxxAVSUGmr7WunZKiDz+tBKR QeqYLNlT/0SDlL+79FfFryJDcCfHzZlhcTYXegfN0T8VNRfoo2D5adch2kqqiOBoP1wb VpdA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ko9EqyqGqvMjncDtON9O136bCfOfMk21zGU8VR16JIw=; b=r+2Tn4Zqe1NLs8OI7GQvIaZ9IlwOQMlJXWwIu2n5ocQIm8bnltVkh1niQjA/frD9xX PpIYGpD+9wgbk7F85LNu5OI5kprgUMGeIaHXn3519obiPE0NSTubdLC4/XhaBhwK/DMB QCmIFuV3Rw9iNbPB9/GUy0tQmX3TdaYeXqUIohQDbTRwrGfu1gjSU4lBAYPpQUIWIrh8 uGmKw7dpEL5KAtRvQiU8A5Uo+5k9OfW7CVgnmFlsuH8CCeKp+mBn5gLB7An9S2GGSZQ3 IUQwFYMaGxn8Xl4q7QfAUinWhBbiTbrpULt20XmaN0zcNWfpgumMqnnGzgczi1xYZ7eK m6qw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlFgf/Ei45kbGR0eU+xfFwjMmMaa6Z1tTgwWyNMW/Fv2LBKE7L9w Zc5DBypZ/I4fuJJdvfQ8mUW0wUox5OdCl2bEaDL4HQ== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:4357:: with SMTP id q84-v6mr4817761lja.13.1532208902755; Sat, 21 Jul 2018 14:35:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a19:fc1c:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Sat, 21 Jul 2018 14:35:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [50.250.208.49] In-Reply-To: <20180628151544.22134-14-antoine.tenart@bootlin.com> References: <20180628151544.22134-1-antoine.tenart@bootlin.com> <20180628151544.22134-14-antoine.tenart@bootlin.com> From: Olof Johansson Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2018 14:35:01 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/14] arm64: dts: marvell: armada-cp110: update the crypto engine compatible To: Antoine Tenart Cc: Herbert Xu , David Miller , Gregory CLEMENT , Andrew Lunn , Jason Cooper , Sebastian Hesselbarth , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Thomas Petazzoni , maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com, miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, Nadav Haklai , oferh@marvell.com, igall@marvell.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 8:15 AM, Antoine Tenart wrote: > New compatibles are now supported by the Inside Secure SafeXcel driver. > As they are more specific than the old ones, they should be used > whenever possible. This patch updates the Marvell cp110 device tree > accordingly. > > Signed-off-by: Antoine Tenart > --- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-cp110.dtsi | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-cp110.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-cp110.dtsi > index 2bf083272a87..bb2914f90048 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-cp110.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-cp110.dtsi > @@ -427,7 +427,7 @@ > }; > > CP110_LABEL(crypto): crypto@800000 { > - compatible = "inside-secure,safexcel-eip197"; > + compatible = "inside-secure,safexcel-eip197b"; So the device is still compatible with the less-specific binding, right? If so, it should probably have both compatible properties in there, not just the more specific one. (Same for another patch in this series). -Olof