Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261802AbTISW6M (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Sep 2003 18:58:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261804AbTISW6L (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Sep 2003 18:58:11 -0400 Received: from primary.dns.nitric.com ([64.81.197.236]:48390 "EHLO primary.mx.nitric.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261802AbTISW6J (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Sep 2003 18:58:09 -0400 To: amartin@nvidia.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Merlin Hughes Subject: RE: [PATCH] 2.4.23-pre4 add support for udma6 to nForce IDE driver Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 18:58:06 -0400 Message-Id: <20030919225808.6DE87338D7@primary.mx.nitric.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 913 Lines: 24 Hi Allen, Do you know if an expected side-effect of this patch would be increased stability? I see that the code does more than just adding in a new UDMA number, I'm just wondering if the other changes could be the deliberate cause of the reliability I'm now seeing. I have an nforce2 motherboard (Shuttle) with a Maxtor UDMA133 drive. Operations such as dd if=/dev/hda of=/dev/null would reliably freeze the machine under 2.4.23-pre4 at UDMA100; I had to drop to UDMA44 to overcome this. Since applying your patch, however, I've managed to run such a dd, with zcav thrown in, with complete relability at UDMA133 for several hours without problems. Thanks, Merlin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/