Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m36-v6csp5837819imm; Mon, 23 Jul 2018 07:00:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpf5cwElY57Xd4gx96Z8sEUqpQMKwedm/zmJQhVi2iFJyLTHX+p1BU5Q9943tr7cFQ9mkwAs X-Received: by 2002:a63:2246:: with SMTP id t6-v6mr12459222pgm.258.1532354412787; Mon, 23 Jul 2018 07:00:12 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1532354412; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ptlFhAgKy2aPeK/GmL3E40a3TIViY12BtCvh1hzWMfT/Nt1ws3qI+NPR0pN9Rmo4zc FiwmWYrvhiGsKL0I4XQsoCUVkpf2JdsAqmScLLw/NdWzZIirU2g+lWXXhvjU22dDy2Um B3Y9iHEUI3G1RwX8fwyi0HVA76LmaUNh6wJa25aURgSnKwmCUWrW8UY2jfP3f4uEfCgi TY15xlDMj6Na5VpyoEqrV6O+Q9oDZTVB+/c9Dg6AxwdcMh0Q1iO1FhLhggA3kCG0f42D TDbxqTvI9nKNCnSyVYku9da0ZNWpHqYH6THqWBephmiwDJQqDcdWbOqoZggI/EzZlaOS Tp3w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:arc-authentication-results; bh=VxvKkCG9xOL1weILHhmX63qhheUCsV0plTqQAzyArJ0=; b=BJ82bQPuqYUhiIHOMXnwv8QFJcoSgSKvB9oS2b8zkIyfzCssQhakQnSg7PjnxaTfc7 NGlcaUzMAw+MKG+hdLdJWuNzAGQ+2EsRd5E4mrZ1Qpd4KT1NX2GcYmDuyAB/KC9xJskf BFmO5uPnLJ3LKbchumV/Q2UORA7Cl4dr3zorelmWwAOka5KRfwVpRWE0a1EZPR5uhKBj NKqF5erKwkc8E/q4ANuVONuwbZRyJYVQFI16Hgso76MZqdsDq0nuClfEyX5MASAcjcVc taZ02+aO65t/NVbN+s9EVuzBbmqhe50J7WXRnv1Dxg0I+ArsvSSR0lHWm5jA3S59XrWj srLg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j21-v6si8742236pgl.8.2018.07.23.06.59.57; Mon, 23 Jul 2018 07:00:12 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388083AbeGWPA3 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 23 Jul 2018 11:00:29 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.11.71.1]:44863 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387940AbeGWPA3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jul 2018 11:00:29 -0400 Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 41Z34j2PKSz9s0w; Mon, 23 Jul 2018 23:59:01 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ellerman.id.au From: Michael Ellerman To: Shilpasri G Bhat , linux@roeck-us.net Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com, stewart@linux.ibm.com, Shilpasri G Bhat Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] hwmon: ibmpowernv: Add attributes to enable/disable sensor groups In-Reply-To: <1532067143-22022-3-git-send-email-shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1532067143-22022-1-git-send-email-shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1532067143-22022-3-git-send-email-shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 23:59:00 +1000 Message-ID: <87fu0ahx3v.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Shilpasri G Bhat writes: > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/ibmpowernv.c b/drivers/hwmon/ibmpowernv.c > index f829dad..99afbf7 100644 > --- a/drivers/hwmon/ibmpowernv.c > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/ibmpowernv.c > @@ -292,12 +344,126 @@ static u32 get_sensor_hwmon_index(struct sensor_data *sdata, > return ++sensor_groups[sdata->type].hwmon_index; > } > > +static int init_sensor_group_data(struct platform_device *pdev, > + struct platform_data *pdata) > +{ > + struct sensor_group_data *sgrp_data; > + struct device_node *groups, *sgrp; > + enum sensors type; > + int count = 0, ret = 0; > + > + groups = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "ibm,opal-sensor-group"); > + if (!groups) > + return ret; > + > + for_each_child_of_node(groups, sgrp) { > + type = get_sensor_type(sgrp); > + if (type != MAX_SENSOR_TYPE) > + pdata->nr_sensor_groups++; > + } > + > + if (!pdata->nr_sensor_groups) > + goto out; > + > + sgrp_data = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, pdata->nr_sensor_groups, > + sizeof(*sgrp_data), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!sgrp_data) { > + ret = -ENOMEM; > + goto out; > + } > + > + for_each_child_of_node(groups, sgrp) { > + const __be32 *phandles; > + int len, gid; > + > + type = get_sensor_type(sgrp); > + if (type == MAX_SENSOR_TYPE) > + continue; > + > + if (of_property_read_u32(sgrp, "sensor-group-id", &gid)) > + continue; > + > + phandles = of_get_property(sgrp, "sensors", &len); > + if (!phandles) > + continue; You should be able to use the more modern OF APIs, eg: rc = of_count_phandle_with_args(sgrp, "sensors", NULL); > + len /= sizeof(u32); > + if (!len) > + continue; Which would make that check unnecessary. > + sensor_groups[type].attr_count++; > + sgrp_data[count].gid = gid; > + mutex_init(&sgrp_data[count].mutex); > + sgrp_data[count++].enable = false; > + } > + > + pdata->sgrp_data = sgrp_data; > +out: > + of_node_put(groups); > + return ret; > +} > + > +static struct sensor_group_data *get_sensor_group(struct platform_data *pdata, > + struct device_node *node, > + enum sensors gtype) > +{ > + struct sensor_group_data *sgrp_data = pdata->sgrp_data; > + struct device_node *groups, *sgrp; > + > + groups = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "ibm,opal-sensor-group"); > + if (!groups) > + return NULL; > + > + for_each_child_of_node(groups, sgrp) { > + const __be32 *phandles; > + int len, gid, i; > + enum sensors type; > + > + type = get_sensor_type(sgrp); > + if (type != gtype) > + continue; > + > + if (of_property_read_u32(sgrp, "sensor-group-id", &gid)) > + continue; > + > + phandles = of_get_property(sgrp, "sensors", &len); > + if (!phandles) > + continue; > + > + len /= sizeof(u32); > + if (!len) > + continue; > + > + while (--len >= 0) > + if (be32_to_cpu(phandles[len]) == node->phandle) > + break; Likewise, here you could use of_for_each_phandle(). cheers