Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261892AbTITOX2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Sep 2003 10:23:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261894AbTITOX2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Sep 2003 10:23:28 -0400 Received: from ppp-217-133-42-200.cust-adsl.tiscali.it ([217.133.42.200]:62849 "EHLO velociraptor.random") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261892AbTITOX0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Sep 2003 10:23:26 -0400 Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 16:23:14 +0200 From: Andrea Arcangeli To: Larry McVoy , Larry McVoy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Fix for wrong OOM killer trigger? Message-ID: <20030920142314.GA1338@velociraptor.random> References: <20030919191613.36750de3.bless@tm.uka.de> <20030919192544.GC1312@velociraptor.random> <20030919203538.D1919@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20030919200117.GE1312@velociraptor.random> <20030919205220.GA19830@work.bitmover.com> <20030920033153.GA1452@velociraptor.random> <20030920043026.GA10836@work.bitmover.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030920043026.GA10836@work.bitmover.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-GPG-Key: 1024D/68B9CB43 13D9 8355 295F 4823 7C49 C012 DFA1 686E 68B9 CB43 X-PGP-Key: 1024R/CB4660B9 CC A0 71 81 F4 A0 63 AC C0 4B 81 1D 8C 15 C8 E5 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2554 Lines: 49 On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 09:30:26PM -0700, Larry McVoy wrote: > The problem is that you are saying that closed source is bad, in > particular, that BitKeeper is bad. That's not the problem, lots of this is not true. I never said that and I will never say that. Find a quote where I said closed source is bad, I think I never said that in my whole life, or if I said that it had to be a joke or something like that. I may have said sometime that binary only drivers are bad but that's just because of the pain they give after you recompile a kernel, and I change the kernel very often ;). I refuse to use closed software myself for my critical tasks true, but I've never said closed software is bad. Closed software it's just not acceptable for my needs, but it can be perfect for others. It's not about good or bad right/wrong here. It's about different people having different needs. And please avoid imagination and stick to facts and to what I write, not to what you think I want to say, because you're wrong about that. As for the economy comments, I would suggest to have a look here: http://insider.thomsonfn.com/tfn/stocks.asp?imodule=coTearsheet&ticker=msft&ttype=A As for the replacement of my signature you should stop insulting me with "I was deliberately rude to the people providing them" or about speculation that I'm saying that closed software is bad or whatever, this is the last email I answer you if you keep making deliberate wrong assumptions about something I never said and I will never say because I simply wouldn't agree with that claims myself. I'm very satisfied with the service you're providing, I thank you a lot of that and for giving us the data in the open, we could lose nearly all the 2.5 development logs if it wasn't for your effort. So I very much hope that you will be able to provide it in the long run and that you will be very successful, but the day you won't be able to provide it anymore for whatever reason, I'm optimistic the open community will be able to find a (possibly inferior) substitute. Andrea - If you refuse to depend on closed software for a critical part of your business, these links may be useful: rsync.kernel.org::pub/scm/linux/kernel/bkcvs/linux-2.[45]/ http://www.cobite.com/cvsps/ svn://svn.kernel.org/linux-2.[46]/trunk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/