Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] f2fs: clear victim_secmap when section has full valid
 blocks
To:     Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@huawei.com>, <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
        <chao@kernel.org>, <yunlong.song@icloud.com>
CC:     <miaoxie@huawei.com>, <bintian.wang@huawei.com>,
        <shengyong1@huawei.com>, <heyunlei@huawei.com>,
        <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <1532355022-163029-1-git-send-email-yunlong.song@huawei.com>
 <1532355022-163029-2-git-send-email-yunlong.song@huawei.com>
From:   Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <fe1659bb-5fed-4d2d-5b68-a109b0235547@huawei.com>
Date:   Tue, 24 Jul 2018 10:52:54 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1532355022-163029-2-git-send-email-yunlong.song@huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 2018/7/23 22:10, Yunlong Song wrote:
> Without this patch, f2fs only clears victim_secmap when it finds out
> that the section has no valid blocks at all, but forgets to clear the
> victim_secmap when the whole section has full valid blocks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@huawei.com>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/segment.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> index cfff7cf..255bff5 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> @@ -776,7 +776,9 @@ static void __remove_dirty_segment(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, unsigned int segno,
>  		if (test_and_clear_bit(segno, dirty_i->dirty_segmap[t]))
>  			dirty_i->nr_dirty[t]--;
>  
> -		if (get_valid_blocks(sbi, segno, true) == 0)
> +		if (get_valid_blocks(sbi, segno, true) == 0 ||
> +			get_valid_blocks(sbi, segno, true) ==
> +			(sbi->segs_per_sec << sbi->log_blocks_per_seg))

BLKS_PER_SEC(sbi)?

Thanks,

>  			clear_bit(GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi, segno),
>  						dirty_i->victim_secmap);
>  	}
>