Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m36-v6csp6553027imm; Mon, 23 Jul 2018 21:49:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpduEhOYGWT17MGDhrj4/458o2eoUyvPcWDz1BmGEu4VIqs9JkLHlagj6IIc03uK8QCgD1uF X-Received: by 2002:a63:9f0a:: with SMTP id g10-v6mr15008889pge.324.1532407740137; Mon, 23 Jul 2018 21:49:00 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1532407740; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=0PUi5de8ALcwQ+wtu+ZPM2wVqbeSHzANR1NSh3xe7pGMesdfE6oO+wXFtHbMbk1LW3 D9eTMHKUuVNnzWBxdUr4Gg4h4Mhrxn38m1xWcKf69lSz1mY+RlNNWEu+RTFAWoHIoGPc atMNK920yJCwi7svR+nWmcas5hGXRQVr5JWE2DpySfnE+Xxt/IoMZefIqtmup2JgPnsw //yQwDQOtT4tU0X0DliiwDEMH6FMbyzGGU/rTO6dZMeSXlgtzZcWor6CDo3YIRiUaESe jhI7KGX5BTsnMfjRvBYwQWA7hpSKUZq6c0Rat2w5vpk0Letp+Xus0hzI1VVLnRcOCL/R tAqg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :message-id:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date :arc-authentication-results; bh=iDAfCn4ddVBrL+Ua9NR8/ZEhyT7bIhosVxUVLhLy7SI=; b=kR0MVP4bQyAoZY+EfGXQZLATblET6edBKbYAcO+Pb0yZbl6y2lkyojdmY4ep3wBM1V eo6ML46xmfsaoBKV5p/4s/XKsoTpOlNKjKlbKrU5hktMPzL0XKGQC/fIJOgC+O9YLNn1 ugUSxAYAhgWoKjDGdAtbWppk3oBUjexR0DYrD69EAcHI4YqqnqfsAyg2bTuPe7A65Bcd vm3d7BAjOP2Iaq+MSUwWink20cZxB9ppW7YfYq0BYo7uXLO21nHws/NhgsjVBQMezff+ 8Q40/eBhMI5kXNMzh1jiPWqgfyz/CiEb8Rn3WwYt9NlENoAp/sFz4FooxHJhGIy/8kMV /hdA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x62-v6si11485357pfd.124.2018.07.23.21.48.44; Mon, 23 Jul 2018 21:49:00 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388345AbeGXFw1 (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 24 Jul 2018 01:52:27 -0400 Received: from smtp1.it.da.ut.ee ([193.40.5.66]:35030 "EHLO smtp1.it.da.ut.ee" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2388203AbeGXFw1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jul 2018 01:52:27 -0400 Received: from math.ut.ee (unknown [IPv6:2001:bb8:2002:2400:5054:ff:fe3b:8db9]) by smtp1.it.da.ut.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id D89A190113; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 07:47:51 +0300 (EEST) Received: by math.ut.ee (Postfix, from userid 1014) id C39FA220910; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 07:47:49 +0300 (EEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by math.ut.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id C98002201DD; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 07:47:49 +0300 (EEST) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 07:47:49 +0300 (EEST) From: Meelis Roos To: Daniel Borkmann cc: Arnd Bergmann , Linux Kernel list , Networking Subject: Re: bisected: 4.18-rc* regression: x86-32 troubles (with timers?) In-Reply-To: <4a48811d-4094-ee4c-33ca-2cf0446a6313@iogearbox.net> Message-ID: References: <32227088-7754-c160-8046-e860f42ca91c@iogearbox.net> <4a48811d-4094-ee4c-33ca-2cf0446a6313@iogearbox.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LRH 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Anyway, I started compile of v4.18-rc5 that was the latest I tested, > > with the commit in question reverted. Will see if I can test tomorrow > > morning. But I will leave tomorrow for a week and can only test further > > things if they happen to boot fine (no manual reboot possible for a > > week). > > Ok, thanks, please keep us posted on the outcome with the revert. Right > now I would doubt it's related resp. changes anything on the issue, but > lets see. v4.18-rc5 minus the patch in question worked fine on 2 bootups so it seems to be good. -- Meelis Roos (mroos@linux.ee)