Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=bidouilliste.com; h=date
        :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references
        :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=
        mail; b=NVlyYX2iEOfjO+06kVew5ucx3F/NwSzgSSQ4+1CVu2H9tj8jlktYs4Pa
        zNd+HlgQyPV0NIdvOpan1FO1kDIp47LgiSkiG2tIkAtJt2u3+u/SDw32f8PtRRWI
        ljWiLtoMPe12YIs+Z+qD04YDyIkIGMoMSzbSuKlxwCGa0ndGNCk=
Date:   Tue, 24 Jul 2018 15:34:32 +0200
From:   Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com>
To:     Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Cc:     Emmanuel Vadot <manu@freebsd.org>, mark.rutland@arm.com,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
        will.deacon@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wens@csie.org,
        robh+dt@kernel.org, srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] arm64: dts: allwinner: h5: Add SID for H5
Message-Id: <20180724153432.e398bddfe63e51e8dcebfc46@bidouilliste.com>
In-Reply-To: <20180724130004.ynaiabshexrrbvo4@flea>
References: <20180724101522.68165-1-manu@freebsd.org>
        <20180724101522.68165-5-manu@freebsd.org>
        <20180724130004.ynaiabshexrrbvo4@flea>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 15:00:04 +0200
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 12:15:22PM +0200, Emmanuel Vadot wrote:
> > The SID controller on H5 look the same as the one present in the A64.
> > But in case we find some difference one day at a compatible string
> > of it's own and a fallback to the A64 one.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Vadot <manu@freebsd.org>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5.dtsi | 5 +++++
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5.dtsi
> > index 62d646baac3c..28183bf77164 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5.dtsi
> > @@ -129,3 +129,8 @@
> >  		     <GIC_SPI 23 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> >  	compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h5-pinctrl";
> >  };
> > +
> > +&sid {
> > +	compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h5-sid",
> > +		     "allwinner,sun50i-a64-sid";
> > +};
> 
> This is still a bit pointless, please remove the common node.

 You mean directly declare sid controller in the SoC dtsi and not have
a common node in sunxi-h3-h5.dtsi ?

> Maxime
> 
> -- 
> Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> https://bootlin.com


-- 
Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> <manu@freebsd.org>