Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
To:     Peter Geis <pgwipeout@gmail.com>
Cc:     Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "robh+dt@kernel.org" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        "jonathanh@nvidia.com" <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
        "mperttunen@nvidia.com" <mperttunen@nvidia.com>,
        "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        "thierry.reding@gmail.com" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
        "mark.rutland@arm.com" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] ARM: dts: tegra: apalis-tk1: major revamp
Date:   Tue, 24 Jul 2018 20:03:18 +0300
Message-ID: <2665137.5yJaStjver@dimapc>
In-Reply-To: <79afd852-af93-dfa1-0d65-11be7507f81f@gmail.com>
References: <20180724104309.21741-1-marcel@ziswiler.com> <4715215.NZcU7pUVUy@dimapc> <79afd852-af93-dfa1-0d65-11be7507f81f@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tuesday, 24 July 2018 18:47:41 MSK Peter Geis wrote:
> On 07/24/2018 10:48 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 24 July 2018 17:45:01 MSK Marcel Ziswiler wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2018-07-24 at 17:31 +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> >>> On Tuesday, 24 July 2018 17:16:33 MSK Marcel Ziswiler wrote:
> >>>> On Tue, 2018-07-24 at 15:44 +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> >>>>> On Tuesday, 24 July 2018 15:24:34 MSK Marcel Ziswiler wrote:
> >>>>>> Sorry, I meant to write "minor revamp" in the subject line here
> >>>>>> as
> >>>>>> Apalis TK1 was already in quite good a shape but this are still
> >>>>>> some
> >>>>>> worthy improvements (;-p).
> >>>>> 
> >>>>>> On Tue, 2018-07-24 at 12:42 +0200, Marcel Ziswiler wrote:
> >>>>> Marcel,
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> All your emails that are sent from "toradex.com" are treated as
> >>>>> spam
> >>>>> by Gmail
> >>>>> because "This message has a from address in toradex.com but has
> >>>>> failed
> >>>>> toradex.com's required tests for authentication.", is there
> >>>>> anything
> >>>>> you could
> >>>>> do to fix that?
> >>>> 
> >>>> Hi Dmitry
> >>>> 
> >>>> Hm, unfortunately, Toradex was an M$ only shop when I joined more
> >>>> then
> >>>> 7 years ago and so far I was unable to convince our IT to switch to
> >>>> some grown up email system. Therefore, I am stuck with Exchange,
> >>>> Office
> >>>> 365 or whatever M$ nowadays seem to call it. Anyway, I really
> >>>> thought
> >>>> sending from Android or Evolution via their resp. Exchange
> >>>> connectors
> >>>> would properly do SPF, DKIM and even DMARC. I just confirmed this
> >>>> when
> >>>> sending something to my gmail address and doing "Show original".
> >>>> 
> >>>> Since Linus himself pointed out any of my patches ending up in his
> >>>> spam
> >>>> folder I do send them via my private email which while not having
> >>>> any
> >>>> advanced security configured should still be valid. Moving it to a
> >>>> fully secure configuration including DNSSEC and stuff is still
> >>>> pending
> >>>> on my side.
> >>>> 
> >>>> Can you please tell me which exact email it is that you got this
> >>>> reported on so I may further investigate what is going on?
> >>> 
> >>> This email from you looks okay. Unfortunately all of your previous
> >>> emails from
> >>> "toradex.com" were getting into the spam folder.
> >> 
> >> You sure they were from "toradex.com"? The patches should have been
> >> coming from "ziswiler.com" resp. "perfora.net".
> > 
> > The patches from "ziswiler.com" are fine, only your emails specifically
> > from "toradex.com" had an issue. Looks like you've resolved it now.
> 
> Dmitry,
> Gmail normally suspends flagging emails as spam from addresses you
> respond to.
> It may pick up again though, so I would add toradex.com to your allow list.

Yes, probably I could add a custom filter for the domain name. But It is not 
really a problem for me, I just wanted to point Marcel at it.