Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 24 Jul 2018 20:36:15 +0200
From:   Simon Baatz <gmbnomis@gmail.com>
To:     Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io>
Cc:     Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: sun8i: r40/v40: rewrite BPi M2 Berry DTS to
 rebase on M2 Ultra
Message-ID: <20180724183613.GA10380@gandalf>
References: <20180724163655.61365-1-icenowy@aosc.io>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180724163655.61365-1-icenowy@aosc.io>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.0 (2018-05-17)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 12:36:55AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> Banana Pi designs the BPi M2 Berry board to be software compatible with
> BPi M2 Ultra, so it's based on M2 Ultra with some function cuts,
> including:
> 
> - 2048MiB DRAM -> 1024MiB (this should be proceed by the bootloader);
> - dropped a LED;
> - dropped eMMC;
> - dropped USB2 and connect USB1 to a 4-port HUB.
> 
> Thus we can make the M2 Berry device tree based on the M2 Ultra, rather
> than write one from scratch.

Good idea!  I know that Ultra came first and then the cut-down Berry. 
But from a device tree point of view, wouldn't it make more sense to
take M2 Berry as the base and just add the hardware for M2 Ultra?