Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262758AbTIVDHa (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Sep 2003 23:07:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262759AbTIVDH3 (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Sep 2003 23:07:29 -0400 Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net ([204.127.202.55]:35068 "EHLO sccrmhc11.comcast.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262758AbTIVDH3 (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Sep 2003 23:07:29 -0400 Subject: CLONE_SIGHAND w/o CLONE_VM From: Albert Cahalan To: linux-kernel mailing list Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1064199244.746.401.camel@cube> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.4 Date: 21 Sep 2003 22:54:05 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 539 Lines: 15 Does CLONE_SIGHAND without CLONE_VM ever make sense? Note that the arch-specific kernel_thread() implementations add CLONE_VM, so kernel_thread() usage doesn't count unless you can point to an arch that doesn't add the CLONE_VM flag. (BTW, the user-mode port is missing CLONE_UNTRACED. Bug?) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/