Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 25 Jul 2018 08:56:32 -0500
From:   Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To:     Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com>
Cc:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kprobes: fix trace_probe flags in enable_trace_kprobe
Message-ID: <20180725135632.zmjq7cuqc7eshpsh@treble>
References: <20180725102826.8300-1-asavkov@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180725102826.8300-1-asavkov@redhat.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180323
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 12:28:26PM +0200, Artem Savkov wrote:
> If enable_trace_kprobe fails to enable the probe in enable_k(ret)probe
> it returns an error, but does not unset the tp flags it set previosly.

"previously"

> @@ -424,6 +423,16 @@ enable_trace_kprobe(struct trace_kprobe *tk, struct trace_event_file *file)
>  		else
>  			ret = enable_kprobe(&tk->rp.kp);
>  	}
> +
> +	if (ret) {
> +		if (file) {
> +			list_del(&link->list);

Should this be list_del_rcu(), since it was added to the list with
list_add_tail_rcu()?

-- 
Josh