Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m36-v6csp841395imm; Wed, 25 Jul 2018 07:08:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpcbYqdCtxuUNfg245/LN0TSLNU0oWI7bof+pq8lybg6yIBAS3ql7a7xAo4ny+vM0D7cVd/x X-Received: by 2002:a65:6411:: with SMTP id a17-v6mr20371746pgv.287.1532527692892; Wed, 25 Jul 2018 07:08:12 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1532527692; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=b32TNS5oRMv3B9+BpTPG85RwEQyGcGDJnVLEBZX0yzl3Kb4x4QhLK5iP6bAMfkplkH 8tJWYLyC8LP14LQZgCoEEBc8pDP1applp1PW+2gbTbYK8ZX4TSuApTNZ5ac29KLrh7dy 8/iIlf+wtDyS4eU3mH78ki+Od3ak0yNf9x9tkLRaMenIHw7BE+hEDfEuO/xYQGGAD1u3 1oXYZgrcrMq+VVEiGRgIpiMQCE9Lj0j4JZdMqYIbCv1o28iuLciEDerdgPsPelfKObhC /S6RZTHnsJMwzdUixohuzGxY6NbByG/vMfKVBVFDS/L8h+gL9HaYY2A49/8/A3ZvfFyB t7XA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:organization:from:references:cc:to:subject :arc-authentication-results; bh=uDgmAPOnygJNKHyiAr+X+GZxbsoOiTFxQHg898meMBI=; b=FmobdKqOlW3tU7AHjABpE9BWmhEFTG7d1rcyPggeww4HUniAm6cnPPMUSdsQDE9mrT O2fviozLAK6/oWhNykpU+lqpYaCwiFJD5V0nslZzpyxCgt7AUr15SYJMZQpxS/jZIsph P1B3lyy1lxeW7KW1cegO96ZS2GNys7GviEr8OYNK3z51A80PzhCM/n8zAcHUon6F8Bl6 eHRanCK0gVww4/yeQGtoDZRVdT7+i8Tof5eH+mdw+xJPuctAITQxU6ygHSqoT4LLyi/9 yOIjKWB7HOYa8RtLeNB4yRJnNCRMuecRhVsP+7LJ1Ke//9mc/WZj+HF4qcLOfU41Jw+3 AjHg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ba6-v6si10612123plb.364.2018.07.25.07.07.57; Wed, 25 Jul 2018 07:08:12 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729190AbeGYPSm (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 25 Jul 2018 11:18:42 -0400 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]:11472 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727946AbeGYPSl (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jul 2018 11:18:41 -0400 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Jul 2018 07:06:51 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.51,401,1526367600"; d="scan'208";a="77727214" Received: from ahunter-desktop.fi.intel.com (HELO [10.237.72.168]) ([10.237.72.168]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 25 Jul 2018 07:06:00 -0700 Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 3/3] mmc: sdhci-msm: Use internal voltage control To: Vijay Viswanath , ulf.hansson@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, shawn.lin@rock-chips.com, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, georgi.djakov@linaro.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, asutoshd@codeaurora.org, stummala@codeaurora.org, venkatg@codeaurora.org, jeremymc@redhat.com, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, riteshh@codeaurora.org, vbadigan@codeaurora.org, evgreen@chromium.org, dianders@google.com, sayalil@codeaurora.org References: <1532083566-43215-1-git-send-email-vviswana@codeaurora.org> <1532083566-43215-4-git-send-email-vviswana@codeaurora.org> From: Adrian Hunter Organization: Intel Finland Oy, Registered Address: PL 281, 00181 Helsinki, Business Identity Code: 0357606 - 4, Domiciled in Helsinki Message-ID: <0a5317f1-b75a-5286-2a53-2fe14b67a77a@intel.com> Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 17:04:22 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1532083566-43215-4-git-send-email-vviswana@codeaurora.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 20/07/18 13:46, Vijay Viswanath wrote: > Some sdhci-msm controllers require that voltage switching be done after > the HW is ready for it. The HW informs its readiness through power irq. > The voltage switching should happen only then. > > Use the quirk for internal voltage switching and then control the > voltage switching using power irq. > > Signed-off-by: Asutosh Das > Signed-off-by: Venkat Gopalakrishnan > Signed-off-by: Veerabhadrarao Badiganti > Signed-off-by: Vijay Viswanath > --- > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c | 220 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 209 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c > index a0dc3e1..47732a2 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c > @@ -43,7 +43,9 @@ > #define CORE_PWRCTL_IO_LOW BIT(2) > #define CORE_PWRCTL_IO_HIGH BIT(3) > #define CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_SUCCESS BIT(0) > +#define CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_FAIL BIT(1) > #define CORE_PWRCTL_IO_SUCCESS BIT(2) > +#define CORE_PWRCTL_IO_FAIL BIT(3) > #define REQ_BUS_OFF BIT(0) > #define REQ_BUS_ON BIT(1) > #define REQ_IO_LOW BIT(2) > @@ -236,6 +238,14 @@ struct sdhci_msm_variant_info { > const struct sdhci_msm_offset *offset; > }; > > +/* Holds voltage regulator information to be used by the driver*/ > +struct sdhci_msm_vreg_info { > + bool vmmc_load; > + u32 vmmc_level[2]; > + bool vqmmc_load; > + u32 vqmmc_level[2]; > +}; Kernel style is not to introduce structures that are only ever wholly contained within one other structure i.e. the members of struct sdhci_msm_vreg_info could just be in struct sdhci_msm_host instead. > + > struct sdhci_msm_host { > struct platform_device *pdev; > void __iomem *core_mem; /* MSM SDCC mapped address */ > @@ -258,6 +268,8 @@ struct sdhci_msm_host { > bool mci_removed; > const struct sdhci_msm_variant_ops *var_ops; > const struct sdhci_msm_offset *offset; > + struct sdhci_msm_vreg_info vreg_info; > + bool pltfm_init_done; > }; > > static const struct sdhci_msm_offset *sdhci_priv_msm_offset(struct sdhci_host *host) > @@ -1314,11 +1326,13 @@ static void sdhci_msm_handle_pwr_irq(struct sdhci_host *host, int irq) > { > struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host); > struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host); > + struct mmc_host *mmc = host->mmc; > u32 irq_status, irq_ack = 0; > - int retry = 10; > + int retry = 10, ret = 0; > u32 pwr_state = 0, io_level = 0; > u32 config; > const struct sdhci_msm_offset *msm_offset = msm_host->offset; > + struct sdhci_msm_vreg_info vreg_info = msm_host->vreg_info; > > irq_status = msm_host_readl(msm_host, host, > msm_offset->core_pwrctl_status); > @@ -1351,14 +1365,91 @@ static void sdhci_msm_handle_pwr_irq(struct sdhci_host *host, int irq) > > /* Handle BUS ON/OFF*/ > if (irq_status & CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_ON) { > - pwr_state = REQ_BUS_ON; > - io_level = REQ_IO_HIGH; > - irq_ack |= CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_SUCCESS; > + if (!IS_ERR(mmc->supply.vmmc)) { > + if (vreg_info.vmmc_load) > + ret = regulator_set_load(mmc->supply.vmmc, > + vreg_info.vmmc_level[1]); > + ret |= mmc_regulator_set_ocr(mmc, mmc->supply.vmmc, > + mmc->ios.vdd); Or-ing error numbers seems a bit weird. The code is a bit crammed also, so I suggest adding helper functions. For example consider something like: static int sdhci_msm_set_vmmc(struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host, struct mmc_host *mmc, int level) { int load = msm_host->vmmc_level[level]; int ret; if (IS_ERR(mmc->supply.vmmc)) return 0; if (msm_host->vmmc_load) { ret = regulator_set_load(mmc->supply.vmmc, load); if (ret) goto out; } ret = mmc_regulator_set_ocr(mmc, mmc->supply.vmmc, mmc->ios.vdd); out: if (ret) pr_err("%s: vmmc failed: %d\n", mmc_hostname(mmc), ret); return ret; } > + if (ret) > + pr_err("%s: vmmc enable failed: %d\n", > + mmc_hostname(mmc), ret); > + } > + > + if (!IS_ERR(mmc->supply.vqmmc) && !ret) { > + struct mmc_ios ios; > + > + if (vreg_info.vqmmc_load) > + ret = regulator_set_load(mmc->supply.vqmmc, > + vreg_info.vqmmc_level[1]); > + /* > + * The IO voltage regulator maynot always support > + * a voltage close to vdd. Set IO voltage based on > + * capability of the regulator. > + */ > + if (msm_host->caps_0 & CORE_3_0V_SUPPORT) > + ios.signal_voltage = MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_330; > + else if (msm_host->caps_0 & CORE_1_8V_SUPPORT) > + ios.signal_voltage = MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_180; > + if (msm_host->caps_0 & CORE_VOLT_SUPPORT) { > + pr_err("%s: %s: setting signal voltage: %d\n", > + mmc_hostname(mmc), __func__, > + ios.signal_voltage); Why pr_err()? > + ret |= mmc_regulator_set_vqmmc(mmc, &ios); Again I suggest createing a helper function and not or-ing error numbers. > + } > + > + if (!ret) > + ret = regulator_enable(mmc->supply.vqmmc); > + if (ret) > + pr_err("%s: vqmmc enable failed: %d\n", > + mmc_hostname(mmc), ret); > + } > + if (!ret) { > + pwr_state = REQ_BUS_ON; > + io_level = REQ_IO_HIGH; > + irq_ack |= CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_SUCCESS; > + } else { > + pr_err("%s: BUS_ON req failed(%d). irq_status: 0x%08x\n", > + mmc_hostname(mmc), ret, irq_status); > + irq_ack |= CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_FAIL; > + } > } > if (irq_status & CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_OFF) { > - pwr_state = REQ_BUS_OFF; > - io_level = REQ_IO_LOW; > - irq_ack |= CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_SUCCESS; > + /* > + * During platform initialization, we may get BUS_OFF request > + * and turn off the supply. EMMC devices expect Power off > + * notification before being turned off. So wait till platform > + * initialization is over to actually turn off power. > + */ > + if (!IS_ERR(mmc->supply.vmmc) && msm_host->pltfm_init_done) { > + if (vreg_info.vmmc_load) > + ret = regulator_set_load(mmc->supply.vmmc, > + vreg_info.vmmc_level[0]); > + ret |= mmc_regulator_set_ocr(mmc, mmc->supply.vmmc, > + mmc->ios.vdd); > + if (ret) > + pr_err("%s: vmmc disabling failed: %d\n", > + mmc_hostname(mmc), ret); > + } So with the function above, that would be: if (msm_host->pltfm_init_done) ret = sdhci_msm_set_vmmc(msm_host, mmc, 0) > + if (!IS_ERR(mmc->supply.vqmmc) && msm_host->pltfm_init_done && > + !ret) { > + if (vreg_info.vqmmc_load) > + ret = regulator_set_load(mmc->supply.vqmmc, > + vreg_info.vqmmc_level[0]); > + ret |= regulator_disable(mmc->supply.vqmmc); > + if (ret) > + pr_err("%s: vqmmc disabling failed: %d\n", > + mmc_hostname(mmc), ret); > + } > + if (!ret) { > + pwr_state = REQ_BUS_OFF; > + io_level = REQ_IO_LOW; > + irq_ack |= CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_SUCCESS; > + } else { > + pr_err("%s: BUS_ON req failed(%d). irq_status: 0x%08x\n", > + mmc_hostname(mmc), ret, irq_status); > + irq_ack |= CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_FAIL; > + } > } > /* Handle IO LOW/HIGH */ > if (irq_status & CORE_PWRCTL_IO_LOW) { > @@ -1370,6 +1461,15 @@ static void sdhci_msm_handle_pwr_irq(struct sdhci_host *host, int irq) > irq_ack |= CORE_PWRCTL_IO_SUCCESS; > } > > + if (io_level && !IS_ERR(mmc->supply.vqmmc) && !pwr_state) { > + ret = mmc_regulator_set_vqmmc(mmc, &mmc->ios); > + if (ret) > + pr_err("%s: IO_level setting failed(%d). signal_voltage: %d, vdd: %d irq_status: 0x%08x\n", > + mmc_hostname(mmc), ret, > + mmc->ios.signal_voltage, mmc->ios.vdd, > + irq_status); > + } > + > /* > * The driver has to acknowledge the interrupt, switch voltages and > * report back if it succeded or not to this register. The voltage > @@ -1415,10 +1515,9 @@ static void sdhci_msm_handle_pwr_irq(struct sdhci_host *host, int irq) > msm_host->curr_pwr_state = pwr_state; > if (io_level) > msm_host->curr_io_level = io_level; > - > pr_debug("%s: %s: Handled IRQ(%d), irq_status=0x%x, ack=0x%x\n", > - mmc_hostname(msm_host->mmc), __func__, irq, irq_status, > - irq_ack); > + mmc_hostname(msm_host->mmc), __func__, > + irq, irq_status, irq_ack); Seem to be some unrelated whitespace changes here. > } > > static irqreturn_t sdhci_msm_pwr_irq(int irq, void *data) > @@ -1563,6 +1662,13 @@ static void sdhci_msm_writeb(struct sdhci_host *host, u8 val, int reg) > sdhci_msm_check_power_status(host, req_type); > } > > +static void sdhci_msm_set_power(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned char mode, > + unsigned short vdd) > +{ > + sdhci_set_power_noreg(host, mode, vdd); Why not just have .set_power = sdhci_set_power_noreg() > + > +} > + > static void sdhci_msm_set_regulator_caps(struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host) > { > struct mmc_host *mmc = msm_host->mmc; > @@ -1605,6 +1711,91 @@ static void sdhci_msm_set_regulator_caps(struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host) > pr_debug("%s: supported caps: 0x%08x\n", mmc_hostname(mmc), caps); > } > > +static int sdhci_msm_register_vreg(struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host) > +{ > + int ret = 0; > + > + ret = mmc_regulator_get_supply(msm_host->mmc); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + if (device_property_read_u32_array(&msm_host->pdev->dev, > + "vmmc-current-level", > + msm_host->vreg_info.vmmc_level, 2) >= 0) > + msm_host->vreg_info.vmmc_load = true; > + if (device_property_read_u32_array(&msm_host->pdev->dev, > + "vqmmc-current-level", > + msm_host->vreg_info.vqmmc_level, 2) >= 0) > + msm_host->vreg_info.vqmmc_load = true; > + > + sdhci_msm_set_regulator_caps(msm_host); > + > + return 0; > + > +} > + > +static int sdhci_msm_start_signal_voltage_switch(struct mmc_host *mmc, > + struct mmc_ios *ios) > +{ > + struct sdhci_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc); > + u16 ctrl; > + > + /* > + * Signal Voltage Switching is only applicable for Host Controllers > + * v3.00 and above. > + */ > + if (host->version < SDHCI_SPEC_300) > + return 0; > + > + ctrl = sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2); > + > + switch (ios->signal_voltage) { > + case MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_330: > + if (!(host->flags & SDHCI_SIGNALING_330)) > + return -EINVAL; > + /* Set 1.8V Signal Enable in the Host Control2 register to 0 */ > + ctrl &= ~SDHCI_CTRL_VDD_180; > + sdhci_writew(host, ctrl, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2); > + > + /* 3.3V regulator output should be stable within 5 ms */ > + ctrl = sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2); > + if (!(ctrl & SDHCI_CTRL_VDD_180)) > + return 0; > + > + pr_warn("%s: 3.3V regulator output did not became stable\n", > + mmc_hostname(mmc)); > + > + return -EAGAIN; > + case MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_180: > + if (!(host->flags & SDHCI_SIGNALING_180)) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + /* > + * Enable 1.8V Signal Enable in the Host Control2 > + * register > + */ > + ctrl |= SDHCI_CTRL_VDD_180; > + sdhci_writew(host, ctrl, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2); > + > + /* 1.8V regulator output should be stable within 5 ms */ > + ctrl = sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2); > + if (ctrl & SDHCI_CTRL_VDD_180) > + return 0; > + > + pr_warn("%s: 1.8V regulator output did not became stable\n", > + mmc_hostname(mmc)); > + > + return -EAGAIN; > + case MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_120: > + if (!(host->flags & SDHCI_SIGNALING_120)) > + return -EINVAL; > + return 0; > + default: > + /* No signal voltage switch required */ > + return 0; > + } > + > +} > + > static const struct sdhci_msm_variant_ops mci_var_ops = { > .msm_readl_relaxed = sdhci_msm_mci_variant_readl_relaxed, > .msm_writel_relaxed = sdhci_msm_mci_variant_writel_relaxed, > @@ -1644,6 +1835,7 @@ static void sdhci_msm_set_regulator_caps(struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host) > .set_uhs_signaling = sdhci_msm_set_uhs_signaling, > .write_w = sdhci_msm_writew, > .write_b = sdhci_msm_writeb, > + .set_power = sdhci_msm_set_power, > }; > > static const struct sdhci_pltfm_data sdhci_msm_pdata = { > @@ -1672,6 +1864,8 @@ static int sdhci_msm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > if (IS_ERR(host)) > return PTR_ERR(host); > > + host->mmc_host_ops.start_signal_voltage_switch = > + sdhci_msm_start_signal_voltage_switch; Perhaps put this where the other mmc_host_ops assignment is. > host->sdma_boundary = 0; > pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host); > msm_host = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host); > @@ -1819,6 +2013,10 @@ static int sdhci_msm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > msm_offset->core_vendor_spec_capabilities0); > } > > + ret = sdhci_msm_register_vreg(msm_host); > + if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) Why not just: if (ret) > + goto clk_disable; > + > /* > * Power on reset state may trigger power irq if previous status of > * PWRCTL was either BUS_ON or IO_HIGH_V. So before enabling pwr irq > @@ -1867,7 +2065,7 @@ static int sdhci_msm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > ret = sdhci_add_host(host); > if (ret) > goto pm_runtime_disable; > - sdhci_msm_set_regulator_caps(msm_host); > + msm_host->pltfm_init_done = true; > > pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(&pdev->dev); > pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(&pdev->dev); >