Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 25 Jul 2018 14:22:46 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To:     Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Michael Lyle <mlyle@lyle.org>,
        Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] lib: add crc64 calculation routines
Message-Id: <20180725142246.23e354fcc21ef041bb3f87e6@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <01f8e352-a49f-2f41-6264-bb6395bb0bf2@suse.de>
References: <20180718165545.1622-1-colyli@suse.de>
        <20180718165545.1622-2-colyli@suse.de>
        <20180724042637.GA1944@sol.localdomain>
        <dd95ab25-562e-1318-19e9-c8163969252f@suse.de>
        <399c1cc851f983370a0308c76c68a97ff41a5d4f.camel@linux.intel.com>
        <01f8e352-a49f-2f41-6264-bb6395bb0bf2@suse.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 10:37:23 +0800 Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> wrote:

> > IIUC this series in Andrew's quilt. So, it's still possible to replace
> > it with better one, I suppose. Ask Andrew (at least I remember recent
> > case where he just replaced series by fixed one).
> 
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> It seems there should be some fix/update for this series. I see current
> series is in linux-next for now. If I want to add the fix, should I post
> a new version of the series, or the incremental patches to fix current
> series ?

mm...  it sounds like the changes will be large, so probably a new
series would be better at this early stage.  If the changes are small
then little fixup patches would be nicer to the people who have already
reviewed v1.