Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 26 Jul 2018 10:10:15 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, tglx@linutronix.de,
        jason@lakedaemon.net, marc.zyngier@arm.com, robh+dt@kernel.org,
        mark.rutland@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, shorne@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] RISC-V: simplify software interrupt / IPI code
Message-ID: <20180726081015.GA22702@lst.de>
References: <20180725093649.32332-2-hch@lst.de> <mhng-03f673cd-5779-44c6-98b3-657e5c4b9d39@palmer-si-x1c4>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <mhng-03f673cd-5779-44c6-98b3-657e5c4b9d39@palmer-si-x1c4>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 02:44:32PM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> I think it's probably easier to have the whole patch set go through the IRQ
> tree, so I won't put these in the RISC-V tree unless someone says something.

No matter where it goes it probably makes sense to keep the whole
series together..