Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m36-v6csp1148313imm; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 11:58:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpd+KsQBjaBLdIjaU3SAHVCR+/alkOQKyRTYx4nUZ9wtIrvaEutxJalEvTUmnzIBqWR8pOTD X-Received: by 2002:a63:a347:: with SMTP id v7-v6mr7025141pgn.182.1532717933207; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 11:58:53 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1532717933; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=NduStKeTnh5keyZh7wuCEkEvTbbU6OzJkL15f/Ge0W92p2ljD97NiCUssgNgTwmOUN h/LwOTQw+ldFh5CkopyAYGCB4pqFXtqunzXx/i4HP3gnuHTJ7zr2wNSxV3ebTrSYw4v/ BvFg0aADCbfyy4y8GAJeqLrYsNjhcZdcE5FhGMFDfPISUMyXAIrn0R61MktadZAUWU5c B52cDX9rW0oyFJRHCfh8uMFz0lRifMpESqANkzixRrRsIY1jwVPLNIAZC+FAyqQ68xkb LCs8JHGTasmq80etjCoTg1bOxpaE2lcgE1x0dhZB2ski84ieMJBv7gQYCsbdxeStIsEL ptHA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :arc-authentication-results; bh=wxBN985lff9ML1yrK8IDD2h5jLatzTq1SlFJC7Q3YWo=; b=QHjocgWaH+L9CSpaN+Jviqt2HHjWE2CCHQTGmuBFCBPG7NSNhIOGu21j5AeUsBRRuc q4RDQtreRtzKT6GMTC/FgnfbJA/xhCIXnkwFfd54BtvfubmcW1RKHhTh1+XaaL2xDDTp ABvdoPfXJTo1B0thtjSUHEK2eVPyLep4qeFzq3uO+JzpBIY6JpQBiwaQQxd+Y5G6Oz3y +VUqRV6BH2jx6bgrP2e08+H1WzoT3ECE20u2qT4om13tDPma7UWQ1x5ziBxZw1ECDCT8 Pe0NaxKpnTGntjx3W12+jEMH4Z3aBCBZ5enzpUPzgnAIRI5ExTDSIHpsuEBeaG/d8jfe GcUg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x3-v6si4773356pfj.289.2018.07.27.11.58.38; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 11:58:53 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389160AbeG0UU7 (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 27 Jul 2018 16:20:59 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:58756 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2389006AbeG0UU7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jul 2018 16:20:59 -0400 Received: from gandalf.local.home (cpe-66-24-56-78.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.56.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 56A8F205F4; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 18:57:46 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 14:57:44 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Joel Fernandes Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com, Boqun Feng , Byungchul Park , Erick Reyes , Ingo Molnar , Julia Cartwright , Masami Hiramatsu , Mathieu Desnoyers , Namhyung Kim , Paul McKenney , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Glexiner , Todd Kjos , Tom Zanussi , Will Deacon Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 2/3] tracepoint: Make rcuidle tracepoint callers use SRCU Message-ID: <20180727145744.2a4464d8@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20180727185113.GA83926@joelaf.mtv.corp.google.com> References: <20180726235044.10195-1-joel@joelfernandes.org> <20180726235044.10195-3-joel@joelfernandes.org> <20180727122659.524dd13f@gandalf.local.home> <20180727185113.GA83926@joelaf.mtv.corp.google.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.16.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 11:51:13 -0700 Joel Fernandes wrote: > When I refactored the code as Peter suggested I happen to move the warning > out but didn't simplify it further (I had it at the back of my head to do > that but missed it). > > Since its quite a simple change I can send a follow up patch doing so later, > or can resend this one. What do you suggest? I'll do it myself if that's OK with you. Thanks, -- Steve