Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m36-v6csp1277934imm; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 14:25:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpeN+JTCeLCcLvkNSCzhWqw3Wa8Et554YUiIJiGAvXFnUSsScmRTzWDbSDtvk2cU/8veFAyf X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:184:: with SMTP id b4-v6mr7570555plb.340.1532726741387; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 14:25:41 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1532726741; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=YpHPbISgwPHzsbupHveZRRgGwkOe3nNJ8o0oRGbnA0WAVHg7cxwgIS+c9YPb1mC2fp kehgnbfJ4OcswdQ/SovOrfTVel0Em+1KH//6MrKEHq3LtDuloZbXKG1igMMIilcNYpbz IdiflnYnkMPWIv0zAFkY2p5XwB9+Vo3fksUcU/LoHH7RgJVHmaRYzaBZFjrtvqRufbd7 sDJLbSiolfoBv/QEGmseAslDtrXunHCGAPborxidFTtW4XrA002dkTz03Qzq8S7wy7Oc zPaA1n4TXyga5Tw26NxZw+CwGKcQPlqZrLt69kNcbejBnauKRzsO55v2/9m2whCq9OBd bYmg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:subject:cc:to:from:date :arc-authentication-results; bh=QRAmpiW4jLh2Nz7ibAL3/l9DDMPNxnuT3/T33wC2gmk=; b=e/X0XyM/Ni8Hoymf7yy18S3es3XymMuzxpmk3/AhgcIMnV3HWwzYYYf/RaLfLStaOn qFTVL56xMtVBlT6i7I1h1xRI6vfS6yvQ1FJ2aKNRzV+RDxtf+fS1/mS1COwYo0gdRFqE pWXPdUYkOEWmC2XS4iMUUkmc97baPzeoy9JyefKtNkHyu97f9OlRL+QQ654S9teQ3uYF QVU5VxctigIaLrIA+b5V8FbSEs3HbHo88c5849cWo7poaoOEAqbTQcdtlnk0KQcPuU+c gBy7i+apfAwh83dEoN9OhE7rvojlj9E1AYVesC7j8I7Ry6YG2fBoeCp2tflTwBFCcrRw v4Jw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 5-v6si4881093pfx.61.2018.07.27.14.25.26; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 14:25:41 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389964AbeG0Wrf (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 27 Jul 2018 18:47:35 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:54242 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2389955AbeG0Wre (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jul 2018 18:47:34 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098394.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w6RLK5ps131131 for ; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 17:23:50 -0400 Received: from e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.97]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2kg7snf730-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 17:23:50 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 22:23:48 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.195) by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.131) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Fri, 27 Jul 2018 22:23:44 +0100 Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (mk.ibm.com [9.149.105.60]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w6RLNhEM7536894 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 27 Jul 2018 21:23:43 GMT Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 590F242041; Sat, 28 Jul 2018 00:23:57 +0100 (BST) Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A1324203F; Sat, 28 Jul 2018 00:23:56 +0100 (BST) Received: from rapoport-lnx (unknown [9.148.206.116]) by d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Sat, 28 Jul 2018 00:23:56 +0100 (BST) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2018 00:23:40 +0300 From: Mike Rapoport To: Paul Burton Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Ralf Baechle , James Hogan , Huacai Chen , Michal Hocko , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Serge Semin Subject: Re: [PATCH] mips: switch to NO_BOOTMEM References: <1531727262-11520-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180726070355.GD8477@rapoport-lnx> <20180726172005.pgjmkvwz2lpflpor@pburton-laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180726172005.pgjmkvwz2lpflpor@pburton-laptop> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18072721-4275-0000-0000-0000029F907C X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18072721-4276-0000-0000-000037A795F4 Message-Id: <20180727212339.GC17745@rapoport-lnx> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-07-27_08:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=979 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1806210000 definitions=main-1807270216 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 10:20:05AM -0700, Paul Burton wrote: > Hi Mike, > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 10:03:56AM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > Any comments on this? > > I haven't looked at this in detail yet, but there was a much larger > series submitted to accomplish this not too long ago, which needed > another revision: > > https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/project/linux-mips/list/?series=787&state=* > > Given that, I'd be (pleasantly) surprised if this one smaller patch is > enough. I didn't test it on the real hardware, so I could have missed something. I've looked at Sergey's patches, largely we are doing the same things. > Thanks, > Paul > -- Sincerely yours, Mike.