Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m36-v6csp1300900imm; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 14:56:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpeVUz6WjL+KNnfzKpZWs/fGISrE9kq2LsItwxHiGJjIvcLPof63UKpQZedzTx0B2jxEeBKH X-Received: by 2002:a63:9856:: with SMTP id l22-v6mr7814141pgo.208.1532728588538; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 14:56:28 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1532728588; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=OuisvWE8Y7qGELbLCoIngdt7PNa3tKDnUTSTnIyQu9hd4GSUIxX2uEOaiFvMjhJopA 3tcUWvaDxV/AY+DOMiw3vJKrQ4Cck0vHzhK9wpHKzWmfiaP34F7LmeSkYOklzPvEqo9b dG9bsWl+LpW80V2vrHVDwJLIAchXPBckS6E3GjlN8DjBrI8CVf7pnVF53r/MkpYMhInO Zxi9XzrKuJa0FYpc8fb/wy53tu8qMshPJJ1mmpPmINfSWLxRx7wRS7/2rbZMYlvAQe1b IPLqVONOGBMAnybla7z7MpIPWAqYG64fh2lT8p39X2Gdr9zo41HAOgveN3kP8erQA8lS wOHQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :message-id:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:date:from:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=S4OI7cm9kBI3hBDdKoscCzfZH7cKLn0cqGhki3a0wq0=; b=zVrT6ujEiAh0LuIwov08AJTxWjDJU9AADSOnV2RUsdrD7rmWbXcHemLt5syLSGae7K ELjIGoJNgpDO+8QU27OwxAa5Rw2JSCeM/2g47x/vpz5CuY6mI2ULcpkI9umt4ZEvLDkW u8TJgBAFB01qYrdToOVVV6rvhIsdH/C0MpF611Wq1r6VUTF2I5RxFyj+bqs6pa9wgAw0 oRCoLvFaaBN7SBecjUFxn/Ld2iNA5lul8pvxu1+RDMXhUbs47EQkGTAXRt3kLCqj1n7t liJu4P9TSHa8gRQT4nW8ri8JEn+s0jwYV5z+XvQ7nqL9CaYhBiWiClTVHMykkmwJqJGd u1kQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=KH+0b6Z9; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b39-v6si4523334pla.26.2018.07.27.14.56.13; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 14:56:28 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=KH+0b6Z9; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2390165AbeG0XSp (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 27 Jul 2018 19:18:45 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-f174.google.com ([209.85.210.174]:38494 "EHLO mail-pf1-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2389816AbeG0XSo (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jul 2018 19:18:44 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-f174.google.com with SMTP id x17-v6so2163696pfh.5 for ; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 14:54:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version; bh=S4OI7cm9kBI3hBDdKoscCzfZH7cKLn0cqGhki3a0wq0=; b=KH+0b6Z9kdzZA2yDvPh8UteeC9B2XUnoQs7k4RBcW07DDzc9DwwYUUE6MDDLf3KXwS ezaw25sKd++8COkECvA3ksIag3anwWvSi5rIut4Oq0pC6RWjtQangNq4Y/CTDMeWxp0D 9LReO9TLie4H8dCj48uc6gO2zvdZT1FfqI3mfj3f6mEQt8vdcsTg8s4Uou5iBwZNFltr aBe6psPnFqjkrM1SGI9+GPH6VVZlXDegAJaqePh/9NGer55XAVcseCORGkQs5pEF/1Ge b2oqYGwmqzT4E/767qs4jb9Ls7Zk2+8yErZumL1QamuqerdEbWS2zmDJdld/KLZKCGN+ zoBg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=S4OI7cm9kBI3hBDdKoscCzfZH7cKLn0cqGhki3a0wq0=; b=qGFw61SiP4CFvnd69SjzkZt4uIA9tWvvc60voTuuU7qt3GKbwurRcIf0leJoPbL01Z AjeUbsmNRTkz/2rgoZSczA9p9OPN72OnUBO1MhshfSn1haavM91WjVBQzcSl69jl/OhU BwndZ6YUbCLszAeER5MLX9kXJb72Cd6DNQCPlm8Ln0vpKT5WA/zj1gL2XJI9+f9YxBOF JJS9y1kZxOzUMmTCD0UjsodPcd4tk7EcceSZUM2qwODq5kgjKTt1fDSVKURrNlXeCwz/ Kz6m60RalsAxtcoNw32ovrFoc0fTu7cNqfuodYLNqVCPwmlTag10DAGeVKoK4Og/MinO 1kMg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlHBEpcbtQJ/2fqzjgGzVSoCHuAWp5BemhQA7xxJBlkoT7wv28Dm HswFQRFdInleBvGKWT/Y87A= X-Received: by 2002:a65:5307:: with SMTP id m7-v6mr7725149pgq.431.1532728493544; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 14:54:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hxeon ([147.46.241.218]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z11-v6sm9178331pff.162.2018.07.27.14.54.51 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 27 Jul 2018 14:54:52 -0700 (PDT) From: SeongJae Park X-Google-Original-From: SeongJae Park Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2018 06:54:49 +0900 (KST) To: Jens Axboe cc: "Wang, Kemi" , SeongJae Park , "Ye, Xiaolong" , "axboe@fb.com" , "lkp@01.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [LKP] [lkp-robot] [brd] 316ba5736c: aim7.jobs-per-min -11.2% regression In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20180604055259.GF16472@yexl-desktop> <1483bdb1-df0c-3b9c-43b9-4f477d00b097@intel.com> <25017BF213203E48912DB000DE5F5E1E6B83C634@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; BOUNDARY="781441777-1528190000-1532728492=:1230" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --781441777-1528190000-1532728492=:1230 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Hello Jens, On Fri, 27 Jul 2018, Jens Axboe wrote: > SeongJae please take a look at this. It's been weeks now and silence > on your end. I'm so sorry for late response. Unfortunately, I was too busy to look this regression deeply. Now the things bothering me are almost finished. Maybe I will have some time from next week. Again, I'm so sorry for this. I will not subject even though you decide to revert the patch. Anyway, I will give you some analysis result by next friday. Thanks, SeongJae Park > > > On 7/26/18 6:58 AM, Wang, Kemi wrote: > > Hi, SeongJae > > Any update or any info you need from my side? > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: SeongJae Park [mailto:sj38.park@gmail.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2018 12:53 AM > > To: Wang, Kemi > > Cc: Ye, Xiaolong ; axboe@kernel.dk; axboe@fb.com; lkp@01.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Subject: Re: [LKP] [lkp-robot] [brd] 316ba5736c: aim7.jobs-per-min -11.2% regression > > > > Oops, I mistakenly found this mail now. I will look inside for this though it will take some time because I will not be in office for this week. > > > > > > Thanks, > > SeongJae Park > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 1:30 AM kemi wrote: > >> > >> Hi, SeongJae > >> Do you have any input for this regression? thanks > >> > >> On 2018年06月04日 13:52, kernel test robot wrote: > >>> > >>> Greeting, > >>> > >>> FYI, we noticed a -11.2% regression of aim7.jobs-per-min due to commit: > >>> > >>> > >>> commit: 316ba5736c9caa5dbcd84085989862d2df57431d ("brd: Mark as > >>> non-rotational") > >>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git > >>> for-4.18/block > >>> > >>> in testcase: aim7 > >>> on test machine: 40 threads Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v2 @ > >>> 3.00GHz with 384G memory with following parameters: > >>> > >>> disk: 1BRD_48G > >>> fs: btrfs > >>> test: disk_rw > >>> load: 1500 > >>> cpufreq_governor: performance > >>> > >>> test-description: AIM7 is a traditional UNIX system level benchmark suite which is used to test and measure the performance of multiuser system. > >>> test-url: > >>> https://sourceforge.net/projects/aimbench/files/aim-suite7/ > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Details are as below: > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------> > >>> > >>> ==================================================================== > >>> ===================== > >>> compiler/cpufreq_governor/disk/fs/kconfig/load/rootfs/tbox_group/test/testcase: > >>> > >>> gcc-7/performance/1BRD_48G/btrfs/x86_64-rhel-7.2/1500/debian-x86_64- > >>> 2016-08-31.cgz/lkp-ivb-ep01/disk_rw/aim7 > >>> > >>> commit: > >>> 522a777566 ("block: consolidate struct request timestamp fields") > >>> 316ba5736c ("brd: Mark as non-rotational") > >>> > >>> 522a777566f56696 316ba5736c9caa5dbcd8408598 > >>> ---------------- -------------------------- > >>> %stddev %change %stddev > >>> \ | \ > >>> 28321 -11.2% 25147 aim7.jobs-per-min > >>> 318.19 +12.6% 358.23 aim7.time.elapsed_time > >>> 318.19 +12.6% 358.23 aim7.time.elapsed_time.max > >>> 1437526 ± 2% +14.6% 1646849 ± 2% aim7.time.involuntary_context_switches > >>> 11986 +14.2% 13691 aim7.time.system_time > >>> 73.06 ± 2% -3.6% 70.43 aim7.time.user_time > >>> 2449470 ± 2% -25.0% 1837521 ± 4% aim7.time.voluntary_context_switches > >>> 20.25 ± 58% +1681.5% 360.75 ±109% numa-meminfo.node1.Mlocked > >>> 456062 -16.3% 381859 softirqs.SCHED > >>> 9015 ± 7% -21.3% 7098 ± 22% meminfo.CmaFree > >>> 47.50 ± 58% +1355.8% 691.50 ± 92% meminfo.Mlocked > >>> 5.24 ± 3% -1.2 3.99 ± 2% mpstat.cpu.idle% > >>> 0.61 ± 2% -0.1 0.52 ± 2% mpstat.cpu.usr% > >>> 16627 +12.8% 18762 ± 4% slabinfo.Acpi-State.active_objs > >>> 16627 +12.9% 18775 ± 4% slabinfo.Acpi-State.num_objs > >>> 57.00 ± 2% +17.5% 67.00 vmstat.procs.r > >>> 20936 -24.8% 15752 ± 2% vmstat.system.cs > >>> 45474 -1.7% 44681 vmstat.system.in > >>> 6.50 ± 59% +1157.7% 81.75 ± 75% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_mlock > >>> 242870 ± 3% +13.2% 274913 ± 7% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_written > >>> 2278 ± 7% -22.6% 1763 ± 21% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_free_cma > >>> 4.75 ± 58% +1789.5% 89.75 ±109% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_mlock > >>> 88018135 ± 3% -48.9% 44980457 ± 7% cpuidle.C1.time > >>> 1398288 ± 3% -51.1% 683493 ± 9% cpuidle.C1.usage > >>> 3499814 ± 2% -38.5% 2153158 ± 5% cpuidle.C1E.time > >>> 52722 ± 4% -45.6% 28692 ± 6% cpuidle.C1E.usage > >>> 9865857 ± 3% -40.1% 5905155 ± 5% cpuidle.C3.time > >>> 69656 ± 2% -42.6% 39990 ± 5% cpuidle.C3.usage > >>> 590856 ± 2% -12.3% 517910 cpuidle.C6.usage > >>> 46160 ± 7% -53.7% 21372 ± 11% cpuidle.POLL.time > >>> 1716 ± 7% -46.6% 916.25 ± 14% cpuidle.POLL.usage > >>> 197656 +4.1% 205732 proc-vmstat.nr_active_file > >>> 191867 +4.1% 199647 proc-vmstat.nr_dirty > >>> 509282 +1.6% 517318 proc-vmstat.nr_file_pages > >>> 2282 ± 8% -24.4% 1725 ± 22% proc-vmstat.nr_free_cma > >>> 357.50 +10.6% 395.25 ± 2% proc-vmstat.nr_inactive_file > >>> 11.50 ± 58% +1397.8% 172.25 ± 93% proc-vmstat.nr_mlock > >>> 970355 ± 4% +14.6% 1111549 ± 8% proc-vmstat.nr_written > >>> 197984 +4.1% 206034 proc-vmstat.nr_zone_active_file > >>> 357.50 +10.6% 395.25 ± 2% proc-vmstat.nr_zone_inactive_file > >>> 192282 +4.1% 200126 proc-vmstat.nr_zone_write_pending > >>> 7901465 ± 3% -14.0% 6795016 ± 16% proc-vmstat.pgalloc_movable > >>> 886101 +10.2% 976329 proc-vmstat.pgfault > >>> 2.169e+12 +15.2% 2.497e+12 perf-stat.branch-instructions > >>> 0.41 -0.1 0.35 perf-stat.branch-miss-rate% > >>> 31.19 ± 2% +1.6 32.82 perf-stat.cache-miss-rate% > >>> 9.116e+09 +8.3% 9.869e+09 perf-stat.cache-misses > >>> 2.924e+10 +2.9% 3.008e+10 ± 2% perf-stat.cache-references > >>> 6712739 ± 2% -15.4% 5678643 ± 2% perf-stat.context-switches > >>> 4.02 +2.7% 4.13 perf-stat.cpi > >>> 3.761e+13 +17.3% 4.413e+13 perf-stat.cpu-cycles > >>> 606958 -13.7% 523758 ± 2% perf-stat.cpu-migrations > >>> 2.476e+12 +13.4% 2.809e+12 perf-stat.dTLB-loads > >>> 0.18 ± 2% -0.0 0.16 ± 9% perf-stat.dTLB-store-miss-rate% > >>> 1.079e+09 ± 2% -9.6% 9.755e+08 ± 9% perf-stat.dTLB-store-misses > >>> 5.933e+11 +1.6% 6.029e+11 perf-stat.dTLB-stores > >>> 9.349e+12 +14.2% 1.068e+13 perf-stat.instructions > >>> 11247 ± 11% +19.8% 13477 ± 9% perf-stat.instructions-per-iTLB-miss > >>> 0.25 -2.6% 0.24 perf-stat.ipc > >>> 865561 +10.3% 954350 perf-stat.minor-faults > >>> 2.901e+09 ± 3% +9.8% 3.186e+09 ± 3% perf-stat.node-load-misses > >>> 3.682e+09 ± 3% +11.0% 4.088e+09 ± 3% perf-stat.node-loads > >>> 3.778e+09 +4.8% 3.959e+09 ± 2% perf-stat.node-store-misses > >>> 5.079e+09 +6.4% 5.402e+09 perf-stat.node-stores > >>> 865565 +10.3% 954352 perf-stat.page-faults > >>> 51.75 ± 5% -12.5% 45.30 ± 10% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.load_avg.avg > >>> 316.35 ± 3% +17.2% 370.81 ± 8% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.util_est_enqueued.stddev > >>> 15294 ± 30% +234.9% 51219 ± 76% sched_debug.cpu.avg_idle.min > >>> 299443 ± 3% -7.3% 277566 ± 5% sched_debug.cpu.avg_idle.stddev > >>> 1182 ± 19% -26.3% 872.02 ± 13% sched_debug.cpu.nr_load_updates.stddev > >>> 1.22 ± 8% +21.7% 1.48 ± 6% sched_debug.cpu.nr_running.avg > >>> 2.75 ± 10% +26.2% 3.47 ± 6% sched_debug.cpu.nr_running.max > >>> 0.58 ± 7% +24.2% 0.73 ± 6% sched_debug.cpu.nr_running.stddev > >>> 77148 -20.0% 61702 ± 7% sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.avg > >>> 70024 -24.8% 52647 ± 8% sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.min > >>> 6662 ± 6% +61.9% 10789 ± 24% sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.stddev > >>> 80.45 ± 18% -19.1% 65.05 ± 6% sched_debug.cpu.nr_uninterruptible.stddev > >>> 76819 -19.3% 62008 ± 8% sched_debug.cpu.sched_count.avg > >>> 70616 -23.5% 53996 ± 8% sched_debug.cpu.sched_count.min > >>> 5494 ± 9% +85.3% 10179 ± 26% sched_debug.cpu.sched_count.stddev > >>> 16936 -52.9% 7975 ± 9% sched_debug.cpu.sched_goidle.avg > >>> 19281 -49.9% 9666 ± 7% sched_debug.cpu.sched_goidle.max > >>> 15417 -54.8% 6962 ± 10% sched_debug.cpu.sched_goidle.min > >>> 875.00 ± 6% -35.0% 569.09 ± 13% sched_debug.cpu.sched_goidle.stddev > >>> 40332 -23.5% 30851 ± 7% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_count.avg > >>> 35074 -26.3% 25833 ± 6% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_count.min > >>> 3239 ± 8% +67.4% 5422 ± 28% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_count.stddev > >>> 5232 +27.4% 6665 ± 13% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_local.avg > >>> 15877 ± 12% +77.5% 28184 ± 27% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_local.max > >>> 2530 ± 10% +95.9% 4956 ± 27% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_local.stddev > >>> 2.52 ± 7% -0.6 1.95 ± 3% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.btrfs_dirty_pages.__btrfs_buffered_write.btrfs_file_write_iter.__vfs_write.vfs_write > >>> 1.48 ± 12% -0.5 1.01 ± 4% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.btrfs_get_extent.btrfs_dirty_pages.__btrfs_buffered_write.btrfs_file_write_iter.__vfs_write > >>> 1.18 ± 16% -0.4 0.76 ± 7% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.btrfs_search_slot.btrfs_lookup_file_extent.btrfs_get_extent.btrfs_dirty_pages.__btrfs_buffered_write > >>> 1.18 ± 16% -0.4 0.76 ± 7% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.btrfs_lookup_file_extent.btrfs_get_extent.btrfs_dirty_pages.__btrfs_buffered_write.btrfs_file_write_iter > >>> 0.90 ± 17% -0.3 0.56 ± 4% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__dentry_kill.dentry_kill.dput.__fput.task_work_run > >>> 0.90 ± 17% -0.3 0.56 ± 4% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.evict.__dentry_kill.dentry_kill.dput.__fput > >>> 0.90 ± 17% -0.3 0.56 ± 4% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.dentry_kill.dput.__fput.task_work_run.exit_to_usermode_loop > >>> 0.90 ± 18% -0.3 0.56 ± 4% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.btrfs_evict_inode.evict.__dentry_kill.dentry_kill.dput > >>> 0.90 ± 17% -0.3 0.57 ± 5% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.exit_to_usermode_loop.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe > >>> 0.90 ± 17% -0.3 0.57 ± 5% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.task_work_run.exit_to_usermode_loop.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe > >>> 0.90 ± 17% -0.3 0.57 ± 5% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__fput.task_work_run.exit_to_usermode_loop.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe > >>> 0.90 ± 17% -0.3 0.57 ± 5% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.dput.__fput.task_work_run.exit_to_usermode_loop.do_syscall_64 > >>> 1.69 -0.1 1.54 ± 2% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.lock_and_cleanup_extent_if_need.__btrfs_buffered_write.btrfs_file_write_iter.__vfs_write.vfs_write > >>> 0.87 ± 4% -0.1 0.76 ± 2% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__clear_extent_bit.clear_extent_bit.lock_and_cleanup_extent_if_need.__btrfs_buffered_write.btrfs_file_write_iter > >>> 0.87 ± 4% -0.1 0.76 ± 2% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.clear_extent_bit.lock_and_cleanup_extent_if_need.__btrfs_buffered_write.btrfs_file_write_iter.__vfs_write > >>> 0.71 ± 6% -0.1 0.61 ± 2% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.clear_state_bit.__clear_extent_bit.clear_extent_bit.lock_and_cleanup_extent_if_need.__btrfs_buffered_write > >>> 0.69 ± 6% -0.1 0.60 ± 2% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.btrfs_clear_bit_hook.clear_state_bit.__clear_extent_bit.clear_extent_bit.lock_and_cleanup_extent_if_need > >>> 96.77 +0.6 97.33 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe > >>> 0.00 +0.6 0.56 ± 3% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.can_overcommit.reserve_metadata_bytes.btrfs_delalloc_reserve_metadata.__btrfs_buffered_write.btrfs_file_write_iter > >>> 96.72 +0.6 97.29 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe > >>> 43.13 +0.8 43.91 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.btrfs_inode_rsv_release.__btrfs_buffered_write.btrfs_file_write_iter.__vfs_write.vfs_write > >>> 42.37 +0.8 43.16 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath._raw_spin_lock.block_rsv_release_bytes.btrfs_inode_rsv_release.__btrfs_buffered_write > >>> 43.11 +0.8 43.89 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.block_rsv_release_bytes.btrfs_inode_rsv_release.__btrfs_buffered_write.btrfs_file_write_iter.__vfs_write > >>> 42.96 +0.8 43.77 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp._raw_spin_lock.block_rsv_release_bytes.btrfs_inode_rsv_release.__btrfs_buffered_write.btrfs_file_write_iter > >>> 95.28 +0.9 96.23 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.ksys_write.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe > >>> 95.22 +1.0 96.18 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.vfs_write.ksys_write.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe > >>> 94.88 +1.0 95.85 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__vfs_write.vfs_write.ksys_write.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe > >>> 94.83 +1.0 95.80 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.btrfs_file_write_iter.__vfs_write.vfs_write.ksys_write.do_syscall_64 > >>> 94.51 +1.0 95.50 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__btrfs_buffered_write.btrfs_file_write_iter.__vfs_write.vfs_write.ksys_write > >>> 42.44 +1.1 43.52 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp._raw_spin_lock.reserve_metadata_bytes.btrfs_delalloc_reserve_metadata.__btrfs_buffered_write.btrfs_file_write_iter > >>> 42.09 +1.1 43.18 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath._raw_spin_lock.reserve_metadata_bytes.btrfs_delalloc_reserve_metadata.__btrfs_buffered_write > >>> 44.07 +1.2 45.29 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.btrfs_delalloc_reserve_metadata.__btrfs_buffered_write.btrfs_file_write_iter.__vfs_write.vfs_write > >>> 43.42 +1.3 44.69 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.reserve_metadata_bytes.btrfs_delalloc_reserve_metadata.__btrfs_buffered_write.btrfs_file_write_iter.__vfs_write > >>> 2.06 ± 18% -0.9 1.21 ± 6% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_search_slot > >>> 2.54 ± 7% -0.6 1.96 ± 3% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_dirty_pages > >>> 1.05 ± 24% -0.5 0.52 ± 9% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp._raw_spin_lock_irqsave > >>> 1.50 ± 12% -0.5 1.03 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_get_extent > >>> 1.22 ± 15% -0.4 0.79 ± 8% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_lookup_file_extent > >>> 0.81 ± 5% -0.4 0.41 ± 6% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_calc_reclaim_metadata_size > >>> 0.74 ± 24% -0.4 0.35 ± 9% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_lock_root_node > >>> 0.74 ± 24% -0.4 0.35 ± 9% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_tree_lock > >>> 0.90 ± 17% -0.3 0.56 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__dentry_kill > >>> 0.90 ± 17% -0.3 0.56 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.evict > >>> 0.90 ± 17% -0.3 0.56 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.dentry_kill > >>> 0.90 ± 18% -0.3 0.56 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_evict_inode > >>> 0.91 ± 18% -0.3 0.57 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.exit_to_usermode_loop > >>> 0.52 ± 20% -0.3 0.18 ± 14% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.do_idle > >>> 0.90 ± 17% -0.3 0.57 ± 5% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.task_work_run > >>> 0.90 ± 17% -0.3 0.57 ± 5% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__fput > >>> 0.90 ± 18% -0.3 0.57 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.dput > >>> 0.51 ± 20% -0.3 0.18 ± 14% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.secondary_startup_64 > >>> 0.51 ± 20% -0.3 0.18 ± 14% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.cpu_startup_entry > >>> 0.50 ± 21% -0.3 0.17 ± 16% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.start_secondary > >>> 0.47 ± 20% -0.3 0.16 ± 13% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.cpuidle_enter_state > >>> 0.47 ± 19% -0.3 0.16 ± 13% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.intel_idle > >>> 0.61 ± 20% -0.3 0.36 ± 11% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_tree_read_lock > >>> 0.47 ± 26% -0.3 0.21 ± 10% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.prepare_to_wait_event > >>> 0.64 ± 18% -0.2 0.39 ± 9% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_read_lock_root_node > >>> 0.40 ± 22% -0.2 0.21 ± 5% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_clear_path_blocking > >>> 0.38 ± 23% -0.2 0.19 ± 13% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.finish_wait > >>> 1.51 ± 3% -0.2 1.35 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__clear_extent_bit > >>> 1.71 -0.1 1.56 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.lock_and_cleanup_extent_if_need > >>> 0.29 ± 25% -0.1 0.15 ± 10% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_orphan_del > >>> 0.27 ± 27% -0.1 0.12 ± 8% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_del_orphan_item > >>> 0.33 ± 18% -0.1 0.19 ± 9% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.queued_read_lock_slowpath > >>> 0.33 ± 19% -0.1 0.20 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__wake_up_common_lock > >>> 0.45 ± 15% -0.1 0.34 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand > >>> 0.47 ± 16% -0.1 0.36 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_check_data_free_space > >>> 0.91 ± 4% -0.1 0.81 ± 3% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.clear_extent_bit > >>> 1.07 ± 5% -0.1 0.97 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__set_extent_bit > >>> 0.77 ± 6% -0.1 0.69 ± 3% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_clear_bit_hook > >>> 0.17 ± 20% -0.1 0.08 ± 10% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.queued_write_lock_slowpath > >>> 0.16 ± 22% -0.1 0.08 ± 24% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_lookup_inode > >>> 0.21 ± 17% -0.1 0.14 ± 19% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__btrfs_update_delayed_inode > >>> 0.26 ± 12% -0.1 0.18 ± 13% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_async_run_delayed_root > >>> 0.52 ± 5% -0.1 0.45 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.set_extent_bit > >>> 0.45 ± 5% -0.1 0.40 ± 3% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.alloc_extent_state > >>> 0.11 ± 17% -0.1 0.06 ± 11% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_clear_lock_blocking_rw > >>> 0.28 ± 9% -0.0 0.23 ± 3% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_drop_pages > >>> 0.07 -0.0 0.03 ±100% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_set_lock_blocking_rw > >>> 0.39 ± 3% -0.0 0.34 ± 3% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.get_alloc_profile > >>> 0.33 ± 7% -0.0 0.29 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_set_extent_delalloc > >>> 0.38 ± 2% -0.0 0.35 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__set_page_dirty_nobuffers > >>> 0.49 ± 3% -0.0 0.46 ± 3% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.pagecache_get_page > >>> 0.18 ± 4% -0.0 0.15 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.truncate_inode_pages_range > >>> 0.08 ± 5% -0.0 0.05 ± 9% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_set_path_blocking > >>> 0.08 ± 6% -0.0 0.06 ± 6% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.truncate_cleanup_page > >>> 0.80 ± 4% +0.2 0.95 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.can_overcommit > >>> 96.84 +0.5 97.37 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe > >>> 96.80 +0.5 97.35 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.do_syscall_64 > >>> 43.34 +0.8 44.17 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_inode_rsv_release > >>> 43.49 +0.8 44.32 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.block_rsv_release_bytes > >>> 95.32 +0.9 96.26 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.ksys_write > >>> 95.26 +0.9 96.20 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.vfs_write > >>> 94.91 +1.0 95.88 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__vfs_write > >>> 94.84 +1.0 95.81 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_file_write_iter > >>> 94.55 +1.0 95.55 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__btrfs_buffered_write > >>> 86.68 +1.0 87.70 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath > >>> 44.08 +1.2 45.31 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_delalloc_reserve_metadata > >>> 43.49 +1.3 44.77 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.reserve_metadata_bytes > >>> 87.59 +1.8 89.38 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp._raw_spin_lock > >>> 0.47 ± 19% -0.3 0.16 ± 13% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.intel_idle > >>> 0.33 ± 6% -0.1 0.18 ± 6% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.get_alloc_profile > >>> 0.27 ± 8% -0.0 0.22 ± 4% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.btrfs_drop_pages > >>> 0.07 -0.0 0.03 ±100% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.btrfs_set_lock_blocking_rw > >>> 0.14 ± 5% -0.0 0.12 ± 6% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.clear_page_dirty_for_io > >>> 0.09 ± 5% -0.0 0.07 ± 10% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp._raw_spin_lock_irqsave > >>> 0.17 ± 4% +0.1 0.23 ± 3% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.reserve_metadata_bytes > >>> 0.31 ± 7% +0.1 0.45 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.can_overcommit > >>> 86.35 +1.0 87.39 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> aim7.jobs-per-min > >>> > >>> 29000 +-+-----------------------------------------------------------------+ > >>> 28500 +-+ +.. + +..+.. +.. | > >>> |..+ +.+..+.. : .. + .+.+..+..+.+.. .+..+.. + + + | > >>> 28000 +-+ + .. : + +. + + + | > >>> 27500 +-+ + + | > >>> | | > >>> 27000 +-+ | > >>> 26500 +-+ | > >>> 26000 +-+ | > >>> | | > >>> 25500 +-+ O O O O O | > >>> 25000 +-+ O O O O O O O O O > >>> | O O O O O O O O | > >>> 24500 O-+O O O O | > >>> 24000 > >>> +-+----------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> + > >>> > >>> > >>> [*] bisect-good sample > >>> [O] bisect-bad sample > >>> > >>> > >>> Disclaimer: > >>> Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are > >>> provided for informational purposes only. Any difference in system > >>> hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. > >>> > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Xiaolong > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> LKP mailing list > >>> LKP@lists.01.org > >>> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/lkp > >>> > > > -- > Jens Axboe > > --781441777-1528190000-1532728492=:1230--