Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m36-v6csp2701946imm; Sun, 29 Jul 2018 01:12:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpfmEjLAg2QbfUYDC4FDrLw96KJYr/Mr6yVqIcKOpazd3mbmDkPyLyGs32b6JQmzsB3WwOQR X-Received: by 2002:a62:5984:: with SMTP id k4-v6mr13235715pfj.116.1532851970842; Sun, 29 Jul 2018 01:12:50 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1532851970; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=z3hg9Nhk5LqHcpF0xyWzdgYvsYkeB+l01PxJk7MW42ZLolsyi+z4nRiWpmYsdYdA94 uV0xwb/qLBAbPvNav0TVGHJZppenOH8l+pMCH6m0ZWzYqSegTu8yJQnwDKOWU48/6FLg QPYZ8xB/qB+eVHGM3z0m0eWkjnOyn51viGFcE4j4wz+gl2N5Gljf5FcZ0vEcaYNHX19D FmZjiv0HbhkFQxyDptGDnOzX/T21O51fuRJJRNXEEbmDvBzT2m+cBP9zu2Bgz7n7YnVV Z8Pq/3ENuxSfEh+z6crzOGmHk7kcehyKENDzXUMOfIlaubZp68uJ4lZFtrbWjUmdQ/9B br9g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=DchAJqxXdiZGJmIOnw2m5aMMTeP/t5fKLZqqVx++O8M=; b=pZH1/sCml+Y6y1vwxl9neY2kkpKegpiWX52dxsM4e8yBjQfDGAzlMhdJ6V8M8TCR3w RVN/FVnGwzzimWgdCkAM3UH0x8erQkTJ5BmZ2Yxu8ptjASHxIBMeZ5ccH9YmqZt62KOZ t8h3QlGSQokRBNrUjDgf8rMsioVQaBhEz4If75PBY7kKlfjSadp44uUey/6KveJ5uz/f 1BYxdBYvw+jA1bwiGrebEiR24cR0htBDmmEMnqo4fpdt2KSLvu9obdGMyB0XXuawUNk4 FmBpnZ3QISwK+JmQQzdkZUuCf8VRZzathr7PnQ1uHFb95CDpSG4n7B6btnGk/22iGYPx sYDg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t61-v6si7429466plb.253.2018.07.29.01.12.22; Sun, 29 Jul 2018 01:12:50 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726295AbeG2Jkf (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 29 Jul 2018 05:40:35 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:55254 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726222AbeG2Jkf (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jul 2018 05:40:35 -0400 Received: from localhost (D57D388D.static.ziggozakelijk.nl [213.125.56.141]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E3FA1C03; Sun, 29 Jul 2018 08:10:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2018 10:10:55 +0200 From: Greg KH To: John Whitmore Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, kstewart@linuxfoundation.org, pombredanne@nexb.com, tglx@linutronix.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] staging:rtl8192u: Remove typedef of struct cmpk_txfb_t - Style Message-ID: <20180729081055.GA21268@kroah.com> References: <20180725221630.28595-1-johnfwhitmore@gmail.com> <20180725221630.28595-2-johnfwhitmore@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180725221630.28595-2-johnfwhitmore@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 11:16:21PM +0100, John Whitmore wrote: > -typedef struct tag_cmd_pkt_tx_feedback { > +struct cmpk_txfb_t { > /* DWORD 0 */ > u8 element_id; /* Command packet type. */ > u8 length; /* Command packet length. */ > @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ typedef struct tag_cmd_pkt_tx_feedback { > /* DWORD 5 */ > u16 reserve3; > u16 duration; > -} cmpk_txfb_t; > +}; People use the "_t" to try to denote a "typedef". When converting to just a structure, there is no need to keep the _t anymore at all, so this should just be "struct cmpk_txfb". Or just drop the typedef and use the name for the struct they had here already, "struct tag_cmd_pkt_tx_feedback", that also would work. Same for all of the other patches in this series. thanks, greg k-h