Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 30 Jul 2018 12:28:38 -0300
From:   Murilo Opsfelder Araujo <muriloo@linux.ibm.com>
To:     LEROY Christophe <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
Cc:     linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "Tobin C . Harding" <me@tobin.cc>,
        Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Simon Guo <wei.guo.simon@gmail.com>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
        Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
        "Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
        Cyril Bur <cyrilbur@gmail.com>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
        Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
        Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com>,
        "Alastair D'Silva" <alastair@d-silva.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/10] powerpc/traps: Use REG_FMT in show_signal_msg()
References: <20180727145811.12334-1-muriloo@linux.ibm.com>
 <20180727145811.12334-5-muriloo@linux.ibm.com>
 <20180727184023.Horde.KRXPzZpG18uxt_B9sy_FBg5@messagerie.si.c-s.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20180727184023.Horde.KRXPzZpG18uxt_B9sy_FBg5@messagerie.si.c-s.fr>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.0 (2018-05-17)
Message-Id: <20180730152838.GA23704@kermit-br-ibm-com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi, Christophe.

On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 06:40:23PM +0200, LEROY Christophe wrote:
> Murilo Opsfelder Araujo <muriloo@linux.ibm.com> a ?crit?:
>
> > Simplify the message format by using REG_FMT as the register format.  This
> > avoids having two different formats and avoids checking for MSR_64BIT.
>
> Are you sure it is what we want ?

Yes.

> Won't it change the behaviour for a 32 bits app running on a 64bits kernel ?

In fact, this changes how many zeroes are prefixed when displaying the registers
(%016lx vs. %08lx format).  For example, 32-bits userspace, 64-bits kernel:

before this series:
  [66475.002900] segv[4599]: unhandled signal 11 at 00000000 nip 10000420 lr 0fe61854 code 1

after this series:
  [   73.414535] segv[3759]: segfault (11) at 0000000000000000 nip 0000000010000420 lr 000000000fe61854 code 1 in segv[10000000+10000]
  [   73.414641] segv[3759]: code: 4e800421 80010014 38210010 7c0803a6 4bffff30 9421ffd0 93e1002c 7c3f0b78
  [   73.414665] segv[3759]: code: 39200000 913f001c 813f001c 39400001 <91490000> 39200000 7d234b78 397f0030

Have you spotted any other behaviour change?

Cheers
Murilo