Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263338AbTIWS3e (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Sep 2003 14:29:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263346AbTIWS3e (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Sep 2003 14:29:34 -0400 Received: from tmr-02.dsl.thebiz.net ([216.238.38.204]:47365 "EHLO gatekeeper.tmr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263338AbTIWS3b (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Sep 2003 14:29:31 -0400 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Path: gatekeeper.tmr.com!davidsen From: davidsen@tmr.com (bill davidsen) Newsgroups: mail.linux-kernel Subject: Re: Can we kill f inb_p, outb_p and other random I/O on port 0x80, in 2.6? Date: 23 Sep 2003 18:20:15 GMT Organization: TMR Associates, Schenectady NY Message-ID: References: <1064275788.9832.1.camel@dhcp23.swansea.linux.org.uk> X-Trace: gatekeeper.tmr.com 1064341215 15263 192.168.12.62 (23 Sep 2003 18:20:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@tmr.com Originator: davidsen@gatekeeper.tmr.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 911 Lines: 15 In article <1064275788.9832.1.camel@dhcp23.swansea.linux.org.uk>, Alan Cox wrote: | On Llu, 2003-09-22 at 19:58, Eric W. Biederman wrote: | > Alan, can you describe a little more what the original delay is needed | > for? I don't see it documented in my 8254 data sheet. The better I | > can understand the problem the better I can write the comments on this | > magic bit of code as I fix it. | | If I remember rightly its because it is a 2Mhz part on an 8Mhz bus. And I thought I was a hotshot overclocker ;-) -- bill davidsen CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/