Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263489AbTIWTVZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Sep 2003 15:21:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263488AbTIWTUO (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Sep 2003 15:20:14 -0400 Received: from zeus.kernel.org ([204.152.189.113]:51102 "EHLO zeus.kernel.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263487AbTIWTTi (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Sep 2003 15:19:38 -0400 From: David Mosberger MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16240.35724.423746.180371@napali.hpl.hp.com> Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 11:06:04 -0700 To: "Van Maren, Kevin" Cc: "David S. Miller" , , , , , , , , , , Subject: RE: NS83820 2.6.0-test5 driver seems unstable on IA64 In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: VM 7.07 under Emacs 21.2.1 Reply-To: davidm@hpl.hp.com X-URL: http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/David_Mosberger/ Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 808 Lines: 17 >>>>> On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 12:58:59 -0500, "Van Maren, Kevin" said: Van> That's my view on the fpswa printk's (handle_fpu_swa): they are Van> normal, expected, and there is absolutely nothing that can be Van> done about them -- so why print a "warning" about them (even if Van> it is only 5 per second)? If nothing else, toggle the meaning Van> for IA64_THREAD_FPEMU_NOPRINT: turn it ON for special apps. So what's wrong with doign prctl --fpemul=silent in the init process? The flags are inherited across fork(). --david - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/