Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1530200714-4504-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
 <1530200714-4504-7-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
 <CANRm+Cz0-61-WOT8CLf02G-aHEwrff6WVWd6mp0DKV+GfFyvWw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKfTPtBMSvfLYAZz6p+uj0G2uq87QzXBOnTHMmzV=niwd0nMjA@mail.gmail.com> <CANRm+Cw7Rg1mFgqAzbS-72z=RZ4mBV_vp=0obC7YPyR5ZdqXVA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANRm+Cw7Rg1mFgqAzbS-72z=RZ4mBV_vp=0obC7YPyR5ZdqXVA@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 31 Jul 2018 10:21:14 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKfTPtDG3d5HtmTXmz4SB9J9Ncv-ATPXsh_VsyJAB9516GLQKg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] sched/irq: add irq utilization tracking
To:     Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
        Morten Rasmussen <Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com>,
        viresh kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
        Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
        Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
        Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>,
        Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it>,
        Claudio Scordino <claudio@evidence.eu.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 at 05:32, Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > >
> > > >  #if defined(CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING) || defined(CONFIG_PARAVIRT_TIME_ACCOUNTING)
> > > >         if ((irq_delta + steal) && sched_feat(NONTASK_CAPACITY))
> > > > -               sched_rt_avg_update(rq, irq_delta + steal);
> > > > +               update_irq_load_avg(rq, irq_delta + steal);
> > >
> > > I think we should not add steal time into irq load tracking, steal
> > > time is always 0 on native kernel which doesn't matter, what will
> > > happen when guest disables IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING and enables
> > > PARAVIRT_TIME_ACCOUNTING? Steal time is not the real irq util_avg. In
> > > addition, we haven't exposed power management for performance which
> > > means that e.g. schedutil governor can not cooperate with passive mode
> > > intel_pstate driver to tune the OPP. To decay the old steal time avg
> > > and add the new one just wastes cpu cycles.
> >
> > In fact, I have kept the same behavior as with rt_avg, which was
> > already adding steal time when computing scale_rt_capacity, which is
> > used to reflect the remaining capacity for FAIR tasks and is used in
> > load balance. I'm not sure that it's worth using different variables
> > for irq and steal.
> > That being said, I see a possible optimization in schedutil when
> > PARAVIRT_TIME_ACCOUNTING is enable and IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING is disable.
> > With this kind of config, scale_irq_capacity can be a nop for
> > schedutil but scales the utilization for scale_rt_capacity
>
> Yeah, this is what in my mind before, you can make a patch for that. :)

ok, I'm going to prepare a patch

Thanks

>
> Regards,
> Wanpeng Li