Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261356AbTIXDin (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Sep 2003 23:38:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261380AbTIXDin (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Sep 2003 23:38:43 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:23210 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261356AbTIXDim (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Sep 2003 23:38:42 -0400 Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 20:38:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: Andrea Arcangeli cc: Larry McVoy , Kernel Mailing List , Matthew Wilcox , Marcelo Tosatti , Larry McVoy Subject: Re: log-buf-len dynamic In-Reply-To: <20030924032837.GP16314@velociraptor.random> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 990 Lines: 27 On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > Really I don't find anything immoral, nor religious here. I only care > about law. Law says if I use bitkeeper I can't develop in the same area, > and so I refuse to use it. it's as simple as that. Go away. I will tell you one more time: it is _fine_ that you don't use BK. Nobody has ever asked you to, in fact. So don't use it. Please. You don't like the license, and what it means. Agreed. That license is a legal document. Agreed. BUT THAT ISN'T THE ISSUE. And that was NEVER the issue, even though you keep bringing it up. Again and again. The issue is that you should not complain about other peoples choices. They are not _your_ choices. Never were, and never will be. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/