Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261268AbTIXJAK (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Sep 2003 05:00:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261326AbTIXJAK (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Sep 2003 05:00:10 -0400 Received: from wohnheim.fh-wedel.de ([213.39.233.138]:38320 "EHLO wohnheim.fh-wedel.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261268AbTIXJAG (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Sep 2003 05:00:06 -0400 Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 10:59:58 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn?= Engel To: Willy Tarreau Cc: John Bradford , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [OT] Re: ATTACK TO MY SYSTEM Message-ID: <20030924085958.GB1355@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> References: <200309240740.h8O7eZNI000474@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> <20030924084616.GA16727@alpha.home.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20030924084616.GA16727@alpha.home.local> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1859 Lines: 49 On Wed, 24 September 2003 10:46:16 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 08:40:35AM +0100, John Bradford wrote: > > > RFC 822, section 3.4.7, makes clear that case is _not_ significant for > > these field names. RFC 2822 doesn't change this. > > Sorry John about the mis-information. Of course case is not significant, > otherwise we would simply not receive these mails. I should have said > "common usage" and not "protocols", since I really thought the former > eventhough I wrote the later. > > > Just because no commonly used E-Mail application seems to generate > > uppercase field names, how do you know something like a password > > auto-responder script won't? > > I don't know. It's only an empirical choice based on observations. Many of us > are more concerned by hundreds of mails a day than risking to get a rare > false-positive. But I agree, I should have been clearer. > > I have nearly the same .procmailrc as the one Joern Engel proposed : > > :0 D > * ^FORM: > spam/swen > > And I too agree that I have 0% false positive so far. But just like any filter, > use at your own risk... All right, let's do this on-list *once* before the already off-topic thread spreads too far. o Filtering by all-uppercase subject, etc. if effective for swen. o This filter has produces 0% false positives *so far*. o This filter, just like any filter, can produce false positives. o Anyone using filters without checking for false positives it at his and her own mercy. Tough luck, deal with it. EOT. J?rn -- A defeated army first battles and then seeks victory. -- Sun Tzu - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/