Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <e3b48104-3efb-1896-0d46-792419f49a75@virtuozzo.com>
 <01000164f169bc6b-c73a8353-d7d9-47ec-a782-90aadcb86bfb-000000@email.amazonses.com>
 <CA+55aFzHR1+YbDee6Cduo6YXHO9LKmLN1wP=MVzbP41nxUb5=g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+55aFzYLgyNp1jsqsvUOjwZdO_1Piqj=iB=rzDShjScdNtkbg@mail.gmail.com>
 <30ee6c72-dc90-275a-8e23-54221f393cb0@virtuozzo.com> <c03fd1ca-0169-4492-7d6f-2df7a91bff5e@gmail.com>
 <CACT4Y+bLbDunoz+0qB=atbQXJ9Gu3N6+UXPwNnqMbq5RyZu1mQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <cf751136-c459-853a-0210-abf16f54ad17@gmail.com> <CACT4Y+b6aCHMTQD21fSf2AMZoH5g8p-FuCVHviMLF00uFV+zGg@mail.gmail.com>
 <01000164f60f3f12-b1253c6e-ee57-49fc-aed8-0944ab4fd7a2-000000@email.amazonses.com>
 <CANn89i+KtwtLvSw1c=Ux8okKP+XyMxzYbuKhYb2qhYeMw=NTzg@mail.gmail.com>
 <01000164f64bd525-be13e04f-18a9-4f7f-a44b-0c0fcec33b71-000000@email.amazonses.com>
 <bf435a04-b689-ec5a-f5df-f47807b43316@gmail.com> <CACT4Y+akncPCAZ2pUX3xEpUPELQAei1XzYByB8Dohfz-Ve0k5w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACT4Y+akncPCAZ2pUX3xEpUPELQAei1XzYByB8Dohfz-Ve0k5w@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Date:   Wed, 1 Aug 2018 10:18:49 -0700
Message-ID: <CANn89iKSwt-1j_p3XvoMTv2NpjJsiv6p7c=xkYKG+zDzcS9hgQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4
 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implementation)
To:     Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc:     Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
        Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
        Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>, jack@suse.com,
        linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
        Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>,
        Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
        David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
        netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org,
        netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk>, dccp@vger.kernel.org,
        jani.nikula@linux.intel.com, joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com,
        rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, airlied@linux.ie,
        intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
        Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>,
        Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
        Ursula Braun <ubraun@linux.ibm.com>,
        linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 9:47 AM Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote:
>
> Proving with numbers is required for a claimed performance improvement
> at the cost of code degradation/increase. For a win-win change there
> is really nothing to prove.

You have to _prove_ it is a win-win.

It is not sufficient to claim it is a win-win.

Sorry, but I do have bugs to take care of.