Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261590AbTIXXM0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Sep 2003 19:12:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261598AbTIXXM0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Sep 2003 19:12:26 -0400 Received: from louise.pinerecords.com ([213.168.176.16]:44180 "EHLO louise.pinerecords.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261590AbTIXXMZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Sep 2003 19:12:25 -0400 Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 01:12:02 +0200 From: Tomas Szepe To: "Brown, Len" Cc: Marcelo Tosatti , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alan Cox , "Nakajima, Jun" , Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: HT not working by default since 2.4.22 Message-ID: <20030924231202.GC5915@louise.pinerecords.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 779 Lines: 20 > [len.brown@intel.com] > > I'm not sure how to address "compatibility" and "regression" concepts in > the face of changing config files. Make oldconfig will ask you about > CONFIG_ACPI -- perhaps I should update the help text to emphasize that > it is necessary for HT, and that if selected, CONFIG_ACPI_HT_ONLY is > then available? Hmm, I happen to know of a system that fails to detect the sibling CPU(s) with CONFIG_ACPI_HT_ONLY set, whereas w/o it "all fine running's." Is this a bug? -- Tomas Szepe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/