Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261772AbTIYI2B (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Sep 2003 04:28:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261764AbTIYI1Z (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Sep 2003 04:27:25 -0400 Received: from dp.samba.org ([66.70.73.150]:9112 "EHLO lists.samba.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261773AbTIYI1V (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Sep 2003 04:27:21 -0400 From: Rusty Russell To: William Lee Irwin III Cc: akpm@zip.com.au, neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au, braam@clusterfs.com, davem@redhat.com, Martin Schwidefsky , David Mosberger-Tang , tridge@samba.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysctl-controlled number of groups. In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 25 Sep 2003 00:25:02 MST." <20030925072502.GL4306@holomorphy.com> Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 18:23:15 +1000 Message-Id: <20030925082720.94F422C35A@lists.samba.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 985 Lines: 22 In message <20030925072502.GL4306@holomorphy.com> you write: > On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 01:21:01PM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote: > > We have a client (using SAMBA) who has people in 190 groups. Since NT > > has hierarchical groups, this is not all that rare. > > What do people think of this patch? > > I like the idea of raising the microscopic limit. BTW, was the Author: > supposed to be Tim Hockin? ISTR his writing this or something almost > identical to it. Also, I'm not sure if the sysctl is worth anything. Nope, it's mine. Tim's is v. similar, and I think a merge of the two would produce something fine. But as he says, it's fairly simple... Cheers, Rusty. -- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/