Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m36-v6csp2010582imm; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 04:58:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpdwjS5Q1BaM5Df/e16d0i2vYI/m2FWUjqC5QXmBWBkwFhZAV6FuwbT9UoXH1jjXcKbMme/T X-Received: by 2002:a62:4695:: with SMTP id o21-v6mr2669642pfi.176.1533211089423; Thu, 02 Aug 2018 04:58:09 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1533211089; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=CGqdpy2LxcJSux3gyelGzdLzNX12eyTOq5IHZQiFen+3IRLneZzEFcMtzQbzE8W+HO x54IooWiyxZvRfEh0f/wuYkXi7SzipCLUNPseXodgVg0KB01Iohdk84a51nyHiczAdnB D+64921MAKK0wAF3gThFCZl5Oo9O3/Avb/+qcEP6DmcrlyvIVnmoz6zVq3z2wfXOq7e0 UssPOPzEH/rl/7XZIxn7Hcus2y6JjhBYuRrL7MMf8pv3F/Hfp0A2vKPUCXgPMkj8mPzp 78zwGjRIGQqmYRKiB+5sAmkBUUrf3CkTGqtnRLFSiKAOkBn7dAOsSGy8LdHzB2qIoF2Z LioA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:mime-version :references:subject:cc:to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=5Eq382gdv+5nYNCueJ5JHm58kH5MtftnnHZdXLp2om0=; b=GfQe6/chvgayXQg4h/JFdoqdHEd1ANv6LVA8M8md2fQMr6MoQhgewX3esG3pTaTuYu xKQwRMsjLwYhanvk0Z8sbvRxmbaZlKGE9Q6SRhWJaP95+wg3FfwWYO+UK7VFmnDe6YGj 0LKYF96qvZ7o3yLdjWQmpa4U5UJPLzjzltqdEy4+ZfefGFU0qvtk/M5fifiJHmJKbCB+ 40keE4F8RqLx9SNJDVAQDvRiZIDP7laJ/YN1pJODdO2bJlqnwDHYCOS6C9Qt5GRAqL4w CfZWEfaHEos/UoPgX3StE+3wqZHYZlp6Az+KLrVP5tQDYzVlPUJ+6kMvoOvqQlk3Wzw0 bqbg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x1-v6si1515472pge.521.2018.08.02.04.57.54; Thu, 02 Aug 2018 04:58:09 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2387447AbeHBNq7 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 2 Aug 2018 09:46:59 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:49960 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387428AbeHBNq7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Aug 2018 09:46:59 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w72Bs4b1020907 for ; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 07:56:08 -0400 Received: from e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.101]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2km026m06y-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 02 Aug 2018 07:56:07 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 12:56:06 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.196) by e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.135) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Thu, 2 Aug 2018 12:56:02 +0100 Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.61]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w72Bu1sw34865164 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 2 Aug 2018 11:56:01 GMT Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E0EB11C04A; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 14:56:11 +0100 (BST) Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74D4811C052; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 14:56:06 +0100 (BST) Received: from rapoport-lnx (unknown [9.148.207.181]) by d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 14:56:05 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2018 14:55:51 +0300 From: Mike Rapoport To: "Fancer's opinion" , Paul Burton Cc: Linux-MIPS , Ralf Baechle , James Hogan , Huacai Chen , Michal Hocko , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mips: switch to NO_BOOTMEM References: <1531727262-11520-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180726070355.GD8477@rapoport-lnx> <20180726172005.pgjmkvwz2lpflpor@pburton-laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18080211-0020-0000-0000-000002AFF113 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18080211-0021-0000-0000-000020FC1D95 Message-Id: <20180802115550.GA10232@rapoport-lnx> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-08-02_03:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=827 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1806210000 definitions=main-1808020125 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 10:55:53PM +0300, Fancer's opinion wrote: > Hello, folks > Regarding the no_bootmem patchset I've sent earlier. > I'm terribly sorry about huge delay with response. I got sucked in a new > project, so just didn't have a time to proceed with the series, answer to the > questions and resend the set. > If it is still relevant and needed for community, I can get back to the series > on the next week, answer to the Mett's questions (sorry, man, for doing it so > long), rebase it on top of the kernel 4.18 and resend the new version. We also > can try to combine it with this patch, if it is found convenient. So, what would be the best way to move forward? > Regards, > -Sergey > > > On Thu, 26 Jul 2018, 20:20 Paul Burton, wrote: > > Hi Mike, > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 10:03:56AM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > Any comments on this? > > I haven't looked at this in detail yet, but there was a much larger > series submitted to accomplish this not too long ago, which needed > another revision: > > ? ? https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/project/linux-mips/list/?series=787& > state=* > > Given that, I'd be (pleasantly) surprised if this one smaller patch is > enough. > > Thanks, > ? ? Paul > -- Sincerely yours, Mike.