Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 02 Aug 2018 11:30:53 -0700 (PDT)
Subject:     Re: Finish the GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER conversion
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1806241513260.8650@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
CC:     linux@armlinux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, jonas@southpole.se,
        stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi, shorne@gmail.com,
        jason@lakedaemon.net, marc.zyngier@arm.com,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, keescook@chromium.org,
        vladimir.murzin@arm.com, nicolas.pitre@linaro.org,
        jinb.park7@gmail.com, yamada.masahiro@socionext.com,
        alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com,
        Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, pombredanne@nexb.com,
        kstewart@linuxfoundation.org, jhogan@kernel.org,
        mark.rutland@arm.com, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org,
        james.morse@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, openrisc@lists.librecores.org
From:   Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
To:     tglx@linutronix.de
Message-ID: <mhng-ef3db5ea-d5f5-4d51-b32c-1b9ca38abccf@palmer-si-x1c4>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (MHng)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, 24 Jun 2018 06:15:25 PDT (-0700), tglx@linutronix.de wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jun 2018, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>> A while ago I sent a patch set that adds a GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER,
>> which is an exact copy of the existing IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER support in the
>> arm port, which is being used unconditionally by arm64 and openrisc.
>> GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER is currently being used by the RISC-V port.  I
>> managed to make a few mistakes in my original patch set and as a result
>> my conversion of the other architectures of GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER
>> was dropped.
>>
>> This patch set finishes up my original patch set by converting arm,
>> arm64, and openrisc over to the new GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER support
>> and then removing MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER as it's obselete.
>>
>> At the time I wrote this I gave it fairly extensive build testing, but
>> went I recently rebased it I just tested the full patch set on arm,
>> arm64, and openrisc defconfigs.
>>
>> Various flavors of this patch set have bounced around a few times
>> before, but I'm calling this a whole new patch set as it builds on top
>> of what was merged.
>
> I'll take the whole pile through tip irq/core which probably makes the most
> sense unless there are any objections from architecture maintainers.

Thanks!  Unless I've managed to screw something up I don't see these in your 
tree, but I also don't see any feedback from anyone else.