Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Message-ID: <e9beb6bba5a7d05741e27e85b24a3b23ba7c2762.camel@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/4] Virtio uses DMA API for all devices
From:   Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To:     "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
        Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
        aik@ozlabs.ru, robh@kernel.org, joe@perches.com,
        elfring@users.sourceforge.net, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au,
        jasowang@redhat.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au, linuxram@us.ibm.com,
        haren@linux.vnet.ibm.com, paulus@samba.org,
        srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, robin.murphy@arm.com,
        jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com, marc.zyngier@arm.com
Date:   Thu, 02 Aug 2018 12:53:41 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20180802200646-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
References: <20180730125100-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
         <20180730111802.GA9830@infradead.org>
         <20180730155633-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
         <20180731173052.GA17153@infradead.org>
         <3d6e81511571260de1c8047aaffa8ac4df093d2e.camel@kernel.crashing.org>
         <20180801081637.GA14438@arm.com> <20180801083639.GF26378@infradead.org>
         <26c1d3d50d8e081eed44fe9940fbefed34598cbd.camel@kernel.crashing.org>
         <20180802182959-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
         <82ccef6ec3d95ee43f3990a4a2d0aea87eb45e89.camel@kernel.crashing.org>
         <20180802200646-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 2018-08-02 at 20:19 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> 
> I see. So yes, given that device does not know or care, using
> virtio features is an awkward fit.
> 
> So let's say as a quick fix for you maybe we could generalize the
> xen_domain hack, instead of just checking xen_domain check some static
> branch.  Then teach xen and others to enable that.>

> OK but problem then becomes this: if you do this and virtio device appears
> behind a vIOMMU and it does not advertize the IOMMU flag, the
> code will try to use the vIOMMU mappings and fail.
>
> It does look like even with trick above, you need a special version of
> DMA ops that does just swiotlb but not any of the other things DMA API
> might do.
> 
> Thoughts?

Yes, this is the purpose of Anshuman original patch (I haven't looked
at the details of the patch in a while but that's what I told him to
implement ;-) :

 - Make virtio always use DMA ops to simplify the code path (with a set
of "transparent" ops for legacy)

 and

 -  Provide an arch hook allowing us to "override" those "transparent"
DMA ops with some custom ones that do the appropriate swiotlb gunk.

Cheers,
Ben.