Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m36-v6csp2477420imm; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 12:15:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpeKblEs2L8BQpbSjg2l6Rxcvyqf0mFEL1Ury4vkkN3QALLrQeLj1k2hdrCesV3nwOtBGrAr X-Received: by 2002:a63:b02:: with SMTP id 2-v6mr665209pgl.301.1533237322328; Thu, 02 Aug 2018 12:15:22 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1533237322; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=OC+VBy1XVFFcED5vvig264rOwlE29RFo8cmbmgPIMpVOvGJfnw7r+ZhY4Q7dOEiyVS aJ2oGERWv6BWu/niB9MRUe8kDqOCvv/iDIxJn7MTVPe7ob3hl2sJUl9crKF2WmGfKCbO AgLxUakFxheLyVYYI7jSiiFQ4cAOka9Q19IebZACh6u+2i6lFv1V/mDINZpnAT6pqr/o DT/0vFSxWh9Q1M/t8yL9xGZDza2XuF2QmAcD6/ApcrlFP6gbnupvu2Qay/Prb91UcF+y jyJ0kjOhb9YWDJfNzrkDxBfXhK2GT1FuxX+37MWToNpZMjfGjaTKcqHgxD+ormwPgiQ4 4f/Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=aUePEB0Mh+aODMTWiP/BaUueFATcOkWh5RAy2LpUHog=; b=a2ap+pNbAtMROleNHUQTLzYBPhpAtMXazM+ujlw9TI4ml+3fMmqQVLigyaR0c8gJeF DAx68nF1pnmekKv0N4hpqhMHd3ke5lYFFdq04U2RPVnRf40zUJ1kaGCFFUbQIw8zHU8F ZpaHd6CHk645SZywqxmxhUfmh4uk4Jbw3WAyfcoLOzLmSs7hMvHIPxkBnBy+dRM/axYr jE/v5wOsK3llq4c4S0OLvo5E0XzZA3PpkwYLQCwnocJlkrMVc5Zg176z8CuFDW2v5zSK /xSVJwJh3rWFuF+g6HwhnCy5zWEtIWB+avw3czZjwtsy61sxWtPTyK6kQd/wKV1Cb7/N 9r+g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n9-v6si2621078pff.370.2018.08.02.12.15.07; Thu, 02 Aug 2018 12:15:22 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727091AbeHBVGf (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 2 Aug 2018 17:06:35 -0400 Received: from bmailout1.hostsharing.net ([83.223.95.100]:51763 "EHLO bmailout1.hostsharing.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726590AbeHBVGf (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Aug 2018 17:06:35 -0400 Received: from h08.hostsharing.net (h08.hostsharing.net [83.223.95.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.hostsharing.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by bmailout1.hostsharing.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A43330001EAF; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 21:14:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: by h08.hostsharing.net (Postfix, from userid 100393) id 4560A2FEA6; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 21:14:05 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2018 21:14:05 +0200 From: Lukas Wunner To: Lyude Paul Cc: nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, Peter Ujfalusi , stable@vger.kernel.org, Ben Skeggs , David Airlie , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/8] drm/nouveau: Enable polling even if we have runtime PM Message-ID: <20180802191405.GB6180@wunner.de> References: <20180801211459.7731-1-lyude@redhat.com> <20180801211459.7731-3-lyude@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180801211459.7731-3-lyude@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 05:14:52PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote: > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c > @@ -592,10 +592,11 @@ nouveau_drm_load(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned long flags) > pm_runtime_allow(dev->dev); > pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(dev->dev); > pm_runtime_put(dev->dev); > - } else { > - /* enable polling for external displays */ > - drm_kms_helper_poll_enable(dev); > } > + > + /* enable polling for connectors without hpd */ > + drm_kms_helper_poll_enable(dev); > + I'm wondering why drm_kms_helper_poll_enable() is called here at all. Does the invocation in nouveau_display_init() not suffice? Can there be a situation when nouveau_display_init() is not called despite there being connectors that need to be polled? Thanks, Lukas