Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] gpio: mvebu: Add support for multiple PWM lines
To:     Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>, aditya@kobol.io,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc:     Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>,
        Ralph Sennhauser <ralph.sennhauser@gmail.com>,
        Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@gmail.com>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        gauthier@kobol.io, alban.browaeys@gmail.com,
        "thierry.reding@gmail.com" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
        linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <1532114623-81911-1-git-send-email-aditya@kobol.io>
 <CACRpkdbiAkt6hT+LeRXCjWDZwjeYDF-e3sckMOWqnL2rdqLDug@mail.gmail.com>
 <87sh3vbxlf.fsf@bootlin.com>
From:   Richard Genoud <richard@sorico.fr>
Message-ID: <e50f0301-f60a-0521-7d73-dcea28721365@sorico.fr>
Date:   Fri, 3 Aug 2018 11:42:56 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <87sh3vbxlf.fsf@bootlin.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 03/08/2018 11:36, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> Hi Linus and Adita
>  
>  On dim., juil. 29 2018, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
> 
>> Hoping for some review from Gergory, Ralph or Richard who all seem
>> to use this driver!
> 
> Would it be possible to resend the series adding me in CC?  I would
> like to comment the patches, but unfortunately it seems that I was in
> none of the mailing list where the series had been sent.
> 
> I found the patches on patchwork, and started to have a look on it for
> example, in the patch "gpio: mvebu: Add support for multiple PWM lines
> per GPIO chip", I wonder why the id is stored as it was not used at all.
> 
> Having the patch inlined in an email would male the review easier.
Same for me :)