Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 13:24:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 13:24:20 -0500 Received: from www.wen-online.de ([212.223.88.39]:5136 "EHLO wen-online.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 13:22:53 -0500 Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 19:22:08 +0100 (CET) From: Mike Galbraith X-X-Sender: To: Alan Cox cc: "Stephen C. Tweedie" , , , , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: Thinko in kswapd? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > > pull it all right back in again. It continues through the entire > > build with the cost seen in the time numbers. (the ac20.virgin run > > was worse by 30 secs than average, but that doesn't matter much) > > Using my reference interactive test (An application which renders 3D graphics > and generates fairly measurable VM traffic with AGP texture mapping)[1] the > graphical flow is noticably stalling where it didn't before. > > Throughput seems to be up but interactivity is bad. If you set the amount that kswapd goes after to be a fraction of inactive_target and leave Stephens change in but ensure that a schedule happens between loops, IIRC interactive is pretty nice while swapping. (haven't tried that particular variant in a while) -Mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/