Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m36-v6csp962953imm; Fri, 3 Aug 2018 15:02:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpflNDFsOWPydQOOqN1ONs0AZJZ8ceKa1SRNTdFjDF13dojTbLx+9+ynbAbGSJ34AZWZ4ame X-Received: by 2002:a63:7d7:: with SMTP id 206-v6mr5405860pgh.137.1533333769312; Fri, 03 Aug 2018 15:02:49 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1533333769; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=u6xCC0POpeCyB5gHIR62K138Q7tF7AZmsuAnOzUY3UVOkZWmOcXM9/5RmYsnKBY1hV vmenFWAqWfNdeGcVXK/2FjFhuiPsW4oslyF33OY5o7ki0SA/chlYBkbX21Re5Vyad9Ym JYOoMiTYFApNz/hu2zNyivuesGPHrzfgF6b7jEVJdlTaxn2JGMnV9OkDOreZ69mN7uSd wTpOzvHoKRL9tILZQ6wLP/IH3AoZ1W90fxPB9fcV5bjy2FIGUnKMtY+vpGsmylJdWqUc soWNlRv6oWYrJCZ/Tr8RHUqeF5uxk8OiNdYdKivWqh3WyC/6dEHrks5qu7Jdq0g02t3W YrYQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:references:in-reply-to:date :subject:cc:to:from:arc-authentication-results; bh=fTDoM3PRVQ6fYTvaapjIIpmz0Xn8RDbSySNEa1Fsexg=; b=fmH1uA60ubqWL35ZvHkkdi9gTeO3ZdzkZ4hgoUAgKkpNHLbQMdznu6XbEHw7ZN/ND1 1SvIpFkRebxLXxr3TsDNPHeZ/pxMPrSKNLTuXO5CHoQ8uFuVq9IBF39pjJ36GRg+goNX kNX7JGSVkDNbTxsPUWAS8PYRk6cG5tT+Wvvm1NlgM4cD7vUSSMjEIFC8JkiLpNWS6QMB FfX+s8Gn2IDoL5+tmhGyCBj5e//ElS3M6C9Kg5NFga53vDJBpBJ/4cPYYeG2v9FBBagY gc3ShCHL4Pjocwpti7r6HzLRKKPC6gs98CKaAgBDFHXqpPMGvC+ilYFSHnHrkpqYpvls oWYA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l26-v6si6116326pfj.188.2018.08.03.15.02.34; Fri, 03 Aug 2018 15:02:49 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732230AbeHCX7b (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 3 Aug 2018 19:59:31 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:40482 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732106AbeHCX7b (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Aug 2018 19:59:31 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w73Ls4c6008313 for ; Fri, 3 Aug 2018 18:01:22 -0400 Received: from e35.co.us.ibm.com (e35.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.153]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2kmudxg8tq-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 03 Aug 2018 18:01:21 -0400 Received: from localhost by e35.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 3 Aug 2018 16:01:21 -0600 Received: from b03cxnp08027.gho.boulder.ibm.com (9.17.130.19) by e35.co.us.ibm.com (192.168.1.135) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Fri, 3 Aug 2018 16:01:19 -0600 Received: from b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.235]) by b03cxnp08027.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w73M1ItZ8585558 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 3 Aug 2018 15:01:18 -0700 Received: from b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 873AE78060; Fri, 3 Aug 2018 16:01:18 -0600 (MDT) Received: from b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id A35CB78067; Fri, 3 Aug 2018 16:01:16 -0600 (MDT) Received: from morokweng.localdomain.com (unknown [9.85.156.5]) by b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 3 Aug 2018 16:01:16 -0600 (MDT) From: Thiago Jung Bauermann To: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Shuah Khan , Andrea Arcangeli , Mike Rapoport , Prakash Sangappa , Thiago Jung Bauermann Subject: [PATCH v2 4/4] userfaultfd: selftest: Cope if shmem doesn't support zeropage Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2018 19:00:46 -0300 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.14.4 In-Reply-To: <20180803220046.4019-1-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> References: <20180803220046.4019-1-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18080322-0012-0000-0000-000016970ED4 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00009479; HX=3.00000241; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000266; SDB=6.01069606; UDB=6.00550093; IPR=6.00848260; MB=3.00022492; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2018-08-03 22:01:20 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18080322-0013-0000-0000-000053E8A075 Message-Id: <20180803220046.4019-5-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-08-03_08:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1807170000 definitions=main-1808030236 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org If userfaultfd runs on a system that doesn't support UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE for shared memory, it currently ends with error code 1 which indicates test failure: # ./userfaultfd shmem 10 10 nr_pages: 160, nr_pages_per_cpu: 80 bounces: 9, mode: rnd poll, unexpected missing ioctl for anon memory # echo $? 1 Change userfaultfd_zeropage_test() to return KSFT_SKIP to indicate that the test is being skipped. Also change userfaultfd_events_test() and userfaultfd_stress() to ignore the missing UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE bit from the list of supported ioctls since these tests don't require that feature. Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann --- tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c index c84e44ddf314..00f1ca663d67 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c @@ -852,6 +852,16 @@ static int uffdio_zeropage(int ufd, unsigned long offset) return __uffdio_zeropage(ufd, offset, false); } +/* Tells whether the kernel doesn't support ZEROPAGE on shared memory VMAs. */ +static bool shmem_without_zeropage_support(unsigned long expected_ioctls, + unsigned long supported_ioctls) +{ + /* Turn off ZEROPAGE bit from expected_ioctls. */ + expected_ioctls &= ~(1 << _UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE); + + return test_type == TEST_SHMEM && supported_ioctls == expected_ioctls; +} + /* exercise UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE */ static int userfaultfd_zeropage_test(void) { @@ -877,10 +887,20 @@ static int userfaultfd_zeropage_test(void) expected_ioctls = uffd_test_ops->expected_ioctls; if ((uffdio_register.ioctls & expected_ioctls) != - expected_ioctls) + expected_ioctls) { + close(uffd); + + if (shmem_without_zeropage_support(expected_ioctls, + uffdio_register.ioctls)) { + fprintf(stderr, + "UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE unsupported in shmem VMAs\n"); + return KSFT_SKIP; + } + fprintf(stderr, - "unexpected missing ioctl for anon memory\n"), - exit(1); + "unexpected missing ioctl for anon memory\n"); + return 1; + } if (uffdio_zeropage(uffd, 0)) { if (my_bcmp(area_dst, zeropage, page_size)) @@ -924,7 +944,10 @@ static int userfaultfd_events_test(void) expected_ioctls = uffd_test_ops->expected_ioctls; if ((uffdio_register.ioctls & expected_ioctls) != - expected_ioctls) + expected_ioctls && + /* No need for zeropage support in this test, so ignore it. */ + !shmem_without_zeropage_support(expected_ioctls, + uffdio_register.ioctls)) fprintf(stderr, "unexpected missing ioctl for anon memory\n"), exit(1); @@ -1117,7 +1140,10 @@ static int userfaultfd_stress(void) } expected_ioctls = uffd_test_ops->expected_ioctls; if ((uffdio_register.ioctls & expected_ioctls) != - expected_ioctls) { + expected_ioctls && + /* No need for zeropage support in this test, so ignore it. */ + !shmem_without_zeropage_support(expected_ioctls, + uffdio_register.ioctls)) { fprintf(stderr, "unexpected missing ioctl for anon memory\n"); return 1;