Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>,
        Lawrence Brakmo <brakmo@fb.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 113/124] tcp: add one more quick ack after after ECN events
Date:   Sat,  4 Aug 2018 11:01:42 +0200
Message-Id: <20180804082706.689516290@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20180804082702.434482435@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20180804082702.434482435@linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: quilt/0.65
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>

[ Upstream commit 15ecbe94a45ef88491ca459b26efdd02f91edb6d ]

Larry Brakmo proposal ( https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/935233/
tcp: force cwnd at least 2 in tcp_cwnd_reduction) made us rethink
about our recent patch removing ~16 quick acks after ECN events.

tcp_enter_quickack_mode(sk, 1) makes sure one immediate ack is sent,
but in the case the sender cwnd was lowered to 1, we do not want
to have a delayed ack for the next packet we will receive.

Fixes: 522040ea5fdd ("tcp: do not aggressively quick ack after ECN events")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reported-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Cc: Lawrence Brakmo <brakmo@fb.com>
Acked-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ static void __tcp_ecn_check_ce(struct so
 		 * it is probably a retransmit.
 		 */
 		if (tp->ecn_flags & TCP_ECN_SEEN)
-			tcp_enter_quickack_mode(sk, 1);
+			tcp_enter_quickack_mode(sk, 2);
 		break;
 	case INET_ECN_CE:
 		if (tcp_ca_needs_ecn(sk))
@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ static void __tcp_ecn_check_ce(struct so
 
 		if (!(tp->ecn_flags & TCP_ECN_DEMAND_CWR)) {
 			/* Better not delay acks, sender can have a very low cwnd */
-			tcp_enter_quickack_mode(sk, 1);
+			tcp_enter_quickack_mode(sk, 2);
 			tp->ecn_flags |= TCP_ECN_DEMAND_CWR;
 		}
 		tp->ecn_flags |= TCP_ECN_SEEN;